added await to get request

[SAUMILDHANKAR]

• Fixes QA Bug Part 2 Update Axios-cache-Interception #1077
• I will merge this myself and then run the CI workflow.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Tests
  • Improved async/await handling in integration tests for better promise control flow and cleaner code structure.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes fix timing issues in an integration test by converting fire-and-forget request invocations to explicit promise handling and consolidating separate request variable creation with awaiting into a single inline awaited call, ensuring proper async sequencing.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Change Summary
Test async/await handling server/__tests__/integration/axios-cache-interceptor.test.js	Replaced non-awaited first request with awaited call and consolidated third request variable creation with inline await, correcting promise handling to ensure proper sequencing and fix race condition causing test failure.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

• Single test file with focused, consistent changes
• Straightforward async/await improvements addressing race conditions
• No complex logic or multi-file dependencies
• Changes are localized and minimal in scope

Poem

🐰 Awaits align with gentle care,
Fire-and-forget becomes aware,
Promise chains now dance as one,
Race conditions? Tests are won! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name	Status	Explanation	Resolution
Docstring Coverage	⚠️ Warning	Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.	You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.

✅ Passed checks (4 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check	✅ Passed	The PR title "added await to get request" directly and accurately summarizes the main changes in the pull request. The modifications involve adding await keywords to request calls in the test file, which is exactly what the title conveys. The title is concise, clear, and specific enough for a teammate to understand the primary change when scanning commit history. It avoids vague terminology and clearly indicates the nature of the code modifications.
Linked Issues Check	✅ Passed	The PR addresses the specific requirements of linked issue #1077, which calls for fixing a failing CI Node.js jest test in axios-cache-interceptor.test.js where res3.cached was expected to be false but received true. The changes made—adding await statements to the first request and converting the third request to an inline awaited call—directly target the cache invalidation behavior by improving promise handling in the test. These modifications address the timing-related cache behavior issue described in the linked issue and align with the objective to fix the cache invalidation assertion.
Out of Scope Changes Check	✅ Passed	All changes in this PR are contained to the single test file specified in the linked issue (server/tests/integration/axios-cache-interceptor.test.js) and are directly related to fixing the failing test case. The modifications involve adding await keywords and restructuring promise handling to address the cache invalidation timing issue, which is precisely what issue #1077 requires. No unrelated changes, refactoring, or modifications to other files are present in this PR.

✨ Finishing touches

• 📝 Generate docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch saumil-1077-fix-axios-test

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8508505 and 8417eef.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• server/__tests__/integration/axios-cache-interceptor.test.js (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (3)

server/__tests__/integration/axios-cache-interceptor.test.js (3)

44-45: Correct fix for the race condition!

Adding await here ensures the first request completes and the cache entry is established before the 11-second timer starts. Previously, the timer started immediately (fire-and-forget), causing the TTL calculation to be incorrect and making res3.cached unexpectedly true.

---

48-48: Good consolidation.

Eliminating the intermediate req3 variable makes the code cleaner and more readable, as the request is only used once.

---

40-51: Confirm test passes in CI after merge.

The test logic is correct: the 11-second wait exceeds the 10-second TTL, and the 70-second jest timeout accommodates this. Since the sandbox cannot execute jest, please verify that the CI Node.js jest check passes after these changes are merged.

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[github-actions]

[SAUMILDHANKAR]

Sorry bypassing rules to merge.