SDK is unsafe?

[coccoinomane]

Hello,

The SDK uses a hardcoded list of makers.

The list is from 1 year ago, so it likely contains makers that are no longer active.

This is unsafe, because funds might be lost if sent to inactive makers.

I hope I am wrong. Please somebody from the team reply, to avoid loss of funds.

Thanks,
Cocco

[coccoinomane]

Confirmed by team on Discord > https://discord.com/channels/847830307000156170/1113980995104940082/1167096157370073140

[Nvl977]

well spotted sir, have you attempted to update these makers based on latest contracts etc?

[coccoinomane]

So far, I just copied the addresses of the makers from Orbiter transactions 😅

To be honest, I could not find a way to automatically parse the makers from the smart contracts. The documentation is rather obscure... Did you @Nvl977?

[Nvl977]

So far, I just copied the addresses of the makers from Orbiter transactions 😅

To be honest, I could not find a way to automatically parse the makers from the smart contracts. The documentation is rather obscure... Did you @Nvl977?

No annoyingly running into a good few issues with this SDK, very frustrating. I am looking to replicate the Arb -> Scroll route so will need to create a Maker for that im sure.... Will be a lot of trial and error i guess. Wish the team could just update this SDK lol