Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
I believe the idea there was that while you may completely remove content items (#6056) or other data, the Audit Trail should remain an immutable store of changes. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I was just creating custom audit trail extension, when I noticed that AuditTrail currently duplicitly stores Documents in json format. As I look at the code I do not see a problem to take version data of content items straight from Document table. I suppose it may be better to deduplicate this data, what do you think?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions