Has anyone tried this with BMAD, SuperClaude, ClaudeFlow etc.? #71
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
You nailed it actually. BMAD, SuperClaude, ClaudeFlow are all orchestration frameworks. They answer the question "who does what" with multiple agents, workflows, specialized roles. They're great at PLANNING and COORDINATION. But they're not memory-strong. When the context window fills up or you start a new session, the agents forget what happened. That's the gap. planning-with-files is the memory layer. It doesn't care who's doing the work, it just makes sure decisions and findings persist to disk. The filesystem becomes external memory that any agent can read. So yes, they work together:
The agents do the work, the files remember what happened. I haven't personally tested all combinations but the architecture supports it. If you try it let me know how it goes, would be curious to hear what works and what breaks. Ahmad |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Some of those tools are not necessarily memory-strong, even when their planning is strong. Do you think PwF is useful as a supplement?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions