Replies: 2 comments
-
|
Hi! Thanks for your interest in xsdba and for sharing these resources. It will be interesting to see how EmpiricalQuantileMapping compares with another method if you want to share your explorations. You could also look at |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Thank you for the note, started with llm comparison notes on the IDL scripts method https://data.chc.ucsb.edu/people/marty/CHIRPS-GEFS_code/ with xsdb https://github.com/icpac-igad/DevOps-hazard-modeling/blob/main/chirps-gefs/README.md, albeit on old version with xclim. The Cannon et al 2015 paper shared gives the need to address Non-Stationarity Issues with the quantile mapping methods, excited to know xsdba could address that. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
The CHIRPS-GEFS bias correction currently uses the routines provided here:
The
xsdba.EmpiricalQuantileMappingmethod appears to implement a very similar approach to the CHIRPS-GEFS quantile-mapping bias correction. It would be valuable to initiate an intercomparison study to evaluate how wellxsdbareproduces or improves upon the existing CHIRPS-GEFS methodology.With the advent of Zarr and analysis-ready, cloud-optimized datasets, this presents a good opportunity.
The three main datasets required for such an implementation are:
I am looking forward to work on this aspect to learn more about xsdba. Thank you for the library.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions