Relative permeability error

[ruchajk2597]

Hello Community,

I am running the relative permeability algorithm and getting the following error. When I remove the snwp the algorithm runs but it means I do not have any pots because there are no points. It says that by default it takes Snwp=100 but tha is not the case. If I manually give some number it throws an error.
I am writing my thesis and this is a very important result for that. It would be great if someone can help me debug the code.

Below is my code snippet and error.

CODE
rp = op.algorithms.metrics.RelativePermeability(network=pn)
rp.setup(invading_phase='n2',invasion_sequence='pore.invasion_sequence')
rp.run(Snwp_num=100)

ERROR

AttributeError Traceback (most recent call last)
Input In [124], in <cell line: 4>()
2 rp.setup(invading_phase='n2',invasion_sequence='pore.invasion_sequence')
3 rp.setup(Snwp_num=100)
----> 4 rp.run(Snwp_num=100)

File C:\ProgramData\Anaconda3\lib\site-packages\openpnm\algorithms\metrics\RelativePermeability.py:324, in RelativePermeability.run(self, Snwp_num)
322 Snwp_num = self.settings['Snwp_num']
323 net = self.project.network
--> 324 K_dir = set(self.settings['flow_inlets'].keys())
325 for dim in K_dir:
326 flow_pores = [net.pores(self.settings['flow_inlets'][dim]),
327 net.pores(self.settings['flow_outlets'][dim])]

AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'keys'

Thank you in advance.

Best Regards,
Rucha

[jgostick]

Hi @ruchajk2597
In V3, which is nearly ready, we have removed the 'metrics' folder, in favor of directing people to detailed examples on how the compute the specific metrics of interest. This example is a bit of a mess at the moment, but gives you the idea. The problem with the metrics functions is that they have to do too much, make too many assumptions, etc.

[ruchajk2597]

Hi, Thank you for the response. I was able to solve the error and run the relative permeability code. Best Regards, Rucha Von: jgostick ***@***.***> Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. September 2022 15:33 An: PMEAL/OpenPNM ***@***.***> Cc: Kunte, Rucha ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***> Betreff: Re: [PMEAL/OpenPNM] Relative permeability error (Discussion #2580) Hi @ruchajk2597<https://github.com/ruchajk2597> In V3, which is nearly ready, we have removed the 'metrics' folder, in favor of directing people to detailed examples on how the compute the specific metrics of interest. This example<https://openpnm.org/examples/applications/relative_permeability.html> is a bit of a mess at the moment, but gives you the idea. The problem with the metrics functions is that they have to do too much, make too many assumptions, etc. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#2580 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A2LYPRYXJZYXIXGLV3GRZ2DWALZR5ANCNFSM6AAAAAAQWX3EZ4>. You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.******@***.***>>