Clarification regarding Bayesian credible intervals

[arunge]

@mgross @arunge we had previously implemented a classical significance test and so this is no longer what is shown? Or differently, please confirm that this is now checking for overlap in Bayesian credible intervals.

Originally posted by @isomemo in #243 (comment)

[arunge]

@mgross Can you please answer the question from @isomemo from above? It is relatd to your new feature, see:

• Version: 24.08.4: Operator significance overlap #243 (comment)
• New map operation that produces a binary map (presence/absence) (OperatoR) #211 (comment)

[arunge]

@mgross Could you please check the issue above or let me know if you have any questions? Many thanks in advance! 🙏