don't talk about TAP (to be squashed)

Test::More generally talks about "tests", ok() evaluates the
expression and "uses that to determine is the test succeeded or
failed", so I've followed that.

Unfortunately "test" is a little overloaded, so it might be more
confusing.

Author: tonycoz

t/test_pl.pod

@@ -203,7 +203,8 @@ Test::More compatible:
 
 =head1 Extended test functions
 
-These test some condition and produce TAP for a test.
+These perform some sort of test, in some cases results for multiple
+tests are produced:
 
 =over
 
@@ -254,7 +255,7 @@ C<@expect_qr> in sequence.
     warnings_like(sub { my $x; $x+1 }, [ qr/Undefined value/ ],
                   "undefined value in addition");
 
-Produces TAP for C< 1 + scalar(@expect_qr) > tests, one for the count
+Produces C< 1 + scalar(@expect_qr) > test results, one for the count
 of warnings, and one for each warning checked.
 
 =item warning_is($subref, $expect, $name)
@@ -346,8 +347,8 @@ run them per C< run_multiple_progs($up, @test_progs) >.
 
 =item run_multiple_progs($up, @test_progs)
 
-Run each of the test programs, producing TAP for a test result for
-each test.
+Run each of the test programs, testing whether the output, and
+optionally the exit value, matches the expected output.
 
 See L</run_multiple_progs() tests> for the details of the format of
 each test.