Skip to content

Conversation

@andrewjschuang
Copy link
Contributor

@andrewjschuang andrewjschuang commented Nov 19, 2024

WHY

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a new FAQ entry addressing the error "could not resolve step[index].uses: component-key@version" when merging to production.
    • Introduced a new section in the troubleshooting guide for GitHub Synced Projects, linking to relevant FAQs.
  • Documentation

    • Enhanced documentation to provide clearer guidance on resolving specific errors encountered during the GitHub sync process.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Nov 19, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Nov 19, 2024 2:23pm
2 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Nov 19, 2024 2:23pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Nov 19, 2024 2:23pm

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 19, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces updates to the documentation related to GitHub workflows and troubleshooting. It includes new sections in two files: one addressing a specific error regarding component keys in workflows and another providing assistance for GitHub Synced Projects. The changes aim to enhance user guidance on resolving common errors encountered during the GitHub sync process.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
docs-v2/pages/projects/git.mdx - Added FAQ entry on resolving "could not resolve step[index].uses: component-key@version" error.
- Previous FAQ entry on "private auth mismatch" remains unchanged.
docs-v2/pages/troubleshooting.mdx - Added section "I need help with my GitHub Synced Project" linking to a related FAQ page.

Possibly related PRs

  • [Docs] Update Workflows Custom Error Handling #12948: This PR updates documentation related to error handling in workflows, which is relevant to the main PR's focus on troubleshooting specific errors encountered during the GitHub sync process.
  • Tips to reduce latency #13996: This PR adds a section on troubleshooting performance issues, which may relate to the overall guidance on resolving errors and improving workflow efficiency mentioned in the main PR.

Poem

🐰 In the land of code where errors play,
A guide was crafted to light the way.
With keys and auth, we’ll fix the plight,
Merging branches, all will be right!
So hop along, dear coder friends,
With clearer docs, the trouble ends! 🐇

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@andrewjschuang has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 8 minutes and 24 seconds before requesting another review.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 88b8e1a and eebc66f.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 88b8e1a and eebc66f.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • docs-v2/pages/projects/git.mdx (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • docs-v2/pages/projects/git.mdx

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
docs-v2/pages/troubleshooting.mdx (1)

33-36: Enhance the GitHub Synced Project section with more context and descriptive link text.

While the section provides a helpful link to the FAQ, it could be more useful with additional context. Consider:

  1. Adding a brief description of common GitHub sync issues users might encounter
  2. Using more descriptive link text that indicates what users will find in the FAQ

Here's a suggested improvement:

 ## I need help with my GitHub Synced Project
 
-[See FAQ here](https://pipedream.com/docs/projects/git#frequently-asked-questions).
+Common issues with GitHub Synced Projects include authentication problems, sync conflicts, and deployment errors. For solutions to these and other frequently asked questions, see the [GitHub Projects FAQ](https://pipedream.com/docs/projects/git#frequently-asked-questions).
docs-v2/pages/projects/git.mdx (1)

201-211: Improve sentence structure and formatting.

The content is technically accurate, but there are a few improvements we can make:

-### How can I fix the error about "could not resolve step[index].uses: component-key@version":
+### How can I fix the error about "could not resolve step[index].uses: component-key@version"?

-When you publish a private component to your workspace and reference it in a workflow, the workspace name should be prefixed in the component key in your `workflow.yaml` configuration file.
+When you publish a private component to your workspace and reference it in a workflow, you must prefix the workspace name in the component key within your `workflow.yaml` configuration file.
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool

[typographical] ~202-~202: Except for inverted sentences, ‘can I’ requires a question mark at the end of the sentence.
Context: ... your workflow.yaml configuration file. For example, if you modified a [regist...

(MD_PRP_QUESTION_MARK)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b4caf02 and d8482b8.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • docs-v2/pages/projects/git.mdx (1 hunks)
  • docs-v2/pages/troubleshooting.mdx (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
docs-v2/pages/projects/git.mdx

[typographical] ~202-~202: Except for inverted sentences, ‘can I’ requires a question mark at the end of the sentence.
Context: ... your workflow.yaml configuration file. For example, if you modified a [regist...

(MD_PRP_QUESTION_MARK)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
docs-v2/pages/projects/git.mdx (1)

212-212: LGTM! Clear and comprehensive explanation.

The explanation of the "private auth mismatch" error is well-structured, providing:

  • Clear conditions that trigger the error
  • Visual reference with the screenshot
  • Actionable steps to resolve the issue

@andrewjschuang andrewjschuang merged commit 9cbf1c2 into master Nov 19, 2024
7 checks passed
@andrewjschuang andrewjschuang deleted the docs/step-uses-error branch November 19, 2024 18:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants