-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
[Components] uptimerobot - new action components #15054
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@jcortes has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 23 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a comprehensive implementation of the Uptime Robot component for Pipedream. It includes new modules for creating and managing monitors, alert contacts, and updating monitor statuses. The changes involve creating utility functions, constants, and an application module that interacts with the Uptime Robot API. The implementation covers key functionalities like creating monitors, alert contacts, and updating their statuses, with robust property definitions and error handling. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (12)
components/uptimerobot/uptimerobot.app.mjs (2)
14-14: Clarify the type casting in the filter function.
While using String() around the status ensures a consistent string comparison, it may obscure potential type mismatches or unexpected data. Consider verifying that the returned status is always a string or coordinate with the API response type.
109-109: Consider adding retry logic or Graceful handling for transient errors.
In _makeRequest, if the network call fails or times out, the code will throw an error. Consider adding a retry mechanism or more specific handling for common transient errors (e.g., network glitches) to make the integration more robust.components/uptimerobot/actions/create-monitor/create-monitor.mjs (2)
211-219: Validate alertContacts when formatting.
formatAlertContacts relies on utils.parseArray, which returns null or undefined for invalid inputs. Consider adding a fallback or error handling to prevent potential mapping issues if alertContacts is not an array.
247-269: Enhance error handling during monitor creation.
The createMonitor method throws only when the underlying app request fails. Consider checking the response for partial failures (e.g., a successful API status code but an error message in the payload) to provide more detailed feedback to users.components/uptimerobot/actions/update-monitor-status/update-monitor-status.mjs (2)
1-1: Consider more explicit error handling.
No specific logic handles cases where updating monitor status fails (e.g., if the monitorId does not exist). Consider adding explicit try/catch blocks to provide clearer error messages.
31-37: Add a status verification step or logging.
Before calling updateMonitor, consider verifying that the monitor is in a suitable state (e.g., not already paused/resumed). This can help avoid redundant API calls or confusion when toggling statuses.components/uptimerobot/common/constants.mjs (1)
70-135: LGTM! Consider adding API version documentationThe alert contact type definitions and mappings look correct. The non-sequential numeric values likely correspond to UptimeRobot's API specifications.
Consider adding a comment indicating which UptimeRobot API version these values correspond to, to help with future maintenance.
Also applies to: 137-154
components/uptimerobot/actions/create-alert-contact/create-alert-contact.mjs (3)
4-31: Consider adding type-specific validation for the value propThe component structure looks good, but the
valueprop could benefit from dynamic validation based on the selected alert contact type. For example:
- Email validation for type "EMAIL"
- Phone number format validation for "SMS" and "VOICE_CALL"
- URL validation for "WEB_HOOK"
value: { type: "string", label: "Value", description: "Alert contact's email address Eg. `[email protected]`, phone Eg. `12345678910` (with country code), username, url Eg. `https://example.com/webhook/` or api key Eg. `dXB0aW1lcm9ib3Q=` depending on the alert contact type.", + validate: ({ value, type }) => { + switch(type) { + case constants.ALERT_CONTACT_TYPE.EMAIL.value: + return /^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/.test(value) || "Invalid email format"; + case constants.ALERT_CONTACT_TYPE.SMS.value: + case constants.ALERT_CONTACT_TYPE.VOICE_CALL.value: + return /^\d+$/.test(value) || "Phone number should contain only digits"; + case constants.ALERT_CONTACT_TYPE.WEB_HOOK.value: + try { + new URL(value); + return true; + } catch(e) { + return "Invalid URL format"; + } + default: + return true; + } + }, },
32-39: Add error handling documentationThe
createAlertContactmethod looks good, but consider documenting possible error scenarios and their handling.Add JSDoc comments to document error cases:
+ /** + * Creates a new alert contact + * @param {Object} args - The alert contact creation arguments + * @throws {Error} When the API request fails + * @throws {Error} When required parameters are missing + * @returns {Promise<Object>} The created alert contact + */ createAlertContact(args = {}) { return this.app.post({ path: "/newAlertContact", ...args, }); },
40-59: Enhance success message with alert contact detailsThe run method implementation looks good, but the success message could be more informative.
- $.export("$summary", "Successfully created the alert contact."); + const contactType = Object.values(constants.ALERT_CONTACT_TYPE) + .find((t) => t.value === type)?.label || type; + $.export("$summary", `Successfully created ${contactType} alert contact for ${friendlyName}`); return response;components/uptimerobot/common/utils.mjs (2)
26-47: Enhance error handling and add documentationThe function would benefit from:
- More specific error messages
- JSDoc documentation
- Explicit handling of different falsy values
Here's a suggested improvement:
+/** + * Parses a value into an array + * @param {*} value - The value to parse + * @returns {Array|undefined} The parsed array or undefined if value is falsy + * @throws {ConfigurationError} If the value cannot be parsed into an array + */ function parseArray(value) { try { if (!value) { + // Consider being more explicit about which falsy values return undefined + if (value === undefined || value === null) { return; + } + throw new Error("Empty value provided"); } if (Array.isArray(value)) { return value; } const parsedValue = JSON.parse(value); if (!Array.isArray(parsedValue)) { - throw new Error("Not an array"); + throw new Error(`Expected an array, but got ${typeof parsedValue}`); } return parsedValue; } catch (e) { - throw new ConfigurationError("Make sure the custom expression contains a valid array object"); + throw new ConfigurationError( + `Invalid array input: ${e.message}. Please provide a valid JSON array or array object.` + ); } }
49-52: Make error handling more explicit in parseArrayAndMapThe optional chaining operator (
?.) inparseArrayAndMapmight silently return undefined whenparseArrayreturns undefined for falsy values. Consider making this behavior more explicit.Here's a suggested improvement:
export default { - parseArrayAndMap: (value) => parseArray(value)?.map(parseJson), + parseArrayAndMap: (value) => { + const arr = parseArray(value); + if (!arr) { + return undefined; + } + return arr.map(parseJson); + }, parseArray, };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (9)
components/uptimerobot/.gitignore(0 hunks)components/uptimerobot/actions/create-alert-contact/create-alert-contact.mjs(1 hunks)components/uptimerobot/actions/create-monitor/create-monitor.mjs(1 hunks)components/uptimerobot/actions/update-monitor-status/update-monitor-status.mjs(1 hunks)components/uptimerobot/app/uptimerobot.app.ts(0 hunks)components/uptimerobot/common/constants.mjs(1 hunks)components/uptimerobot/common/utils.mjs(1 hunks)components/uptimerobot/package.json(2 hunks)components/uptimerobot/uptimerobot.app.mjs(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- components/uptimerobot/.gitignore
- components/uptimerobot/app/uptimerobot.app.ts
🔇 Additional comments (5)
components/uptimerobot/uptimerobot.app.mjs (2)
76-90: Confirm the string status values.
Currently, the "Pause" and "Resume" options map to "0" and "1", respectively. Although correct according to Uptime Robot’s API spec, confirm that all references and usage areas treat these values as strings rather than numeric.
111-124: Check the debug flag usage.
Currently, the axios call is invoked with debug: true, which might generate verbose logs and reveal sensitive data in certain environments. Make sure this is intended for production or consider toggling it based on an environment variable.
components/uptimerobot/package.json (1)
Line range hint 3-19: Validate pinned versions and semver compliance.
The version is pinned to 3.0.3 for @pipedream/platform. Ensure that you periodically check for updates and security patches in any future stable releases.
components/uptimerobot/common/constants.mjs (1)
39-68: LGTM! Port type definitions are well-structured
The port type definitions and their corresponding default port values are correctly implemented. Good job on excluding the CUSTOM port type from PORT_VALUE_MAP as it doesn't have a default value.
Also applies to: 156-163
components/uptimerobot/common/utils.mjs (1)
1-52: Verify usage patterns and potential duplication
Let's verify how these utilities are used and if similar functionality exists elsewhere in the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional scripts to check the specific usage of these utilities in the UptimeRobot component and look for similar parsing patterns.
Based on the results, I can now provide a final response:
Common utility implementation follows established patterns
The parseArray and parseJson utilities in UptimeRobot's utils.mjs follow a common implementation pattern used across many components in the codebase. The code is being used in the create-monitor action for handling alert contacts. This is a standard, well-tested approach that matches similar implementations in components like Algolia, Google Ad Manager, and many others.
- The
parseArrayfunction is used incomponents/uptimerobot/actions/create-monitor/create-monitor.mjsfor processing alert contacts - The implementation matches the pattern used in 40+ other components
- The recursive
parseJsonimplementation is identical to the one used in components like Algolia, Ollama, and RoamResearch
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for similar JSON/Array parsing utilities
echo "Searching for similar parsing utilities..."
rg -l "parseJson|parseArray" --type js
# Check usage patterns
echo "Checking usage patterns..."
rg -A 5 "parseArrayAndMap|parseArray" --type js
# Look for potential parsing utilities in other components
echo "Checking for similar utilities in other components..."
fd "utils.m?js" -t f components/
Length of output: 16113
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for usage within UptimeRobot component
echo "Checking usage within UptimeRobot component..."
rg -A 5 "parseArrayAndMap|parseArray" components/uptimerobot/
# Look for similar JSON/Array parsing patterns
echo "Checking for similar parsing patterns..."
ast-grep --pattern 'function parseArray($_) { $$$ }'
ast-grep --pattern 'const parseJson = ($_) => { $$$ }'
# Check imports of utils.mjs
echo "Checking imports of utils.mjs..."
rg -l "from.*uptimerobot/common/utils" components/uptimerobot/
Length of output: 66271
components/uptimerobot/actions/create-monitor/create-monitor.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
4e158b8 to
d406c27
Compare
d406c27 to
3bce738
Compare
luancazarine
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @jcortes! I just added some suggestions but I'm moving it to Ready for QA anyway
WHY
Resolves #14966
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
.gitignorefile to streamline the repository.Documentation
package.jsonto reflect new versioning and dependencies for the Uptime Robot component.