-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.5k
[Components] dataforseo #13299 #15491
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ |
WalkthroughThis pull request adds multiple modules to integrate with the DataForSEO API. New action modules have been introduced to retrieve business listings, keyword difficulty metrics, and ranked keywords. These modules define unique keys, metadata, and relevant properties, along with asynchronous Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client as Client
participant Action as Action Module
participant App as DataForSEO App
participant API as DataForSEO API
Client->>Action: Invoke run() with parameters
Action->>App: Call specific API method (e.g., getBusinessListings)
App->>API: Execute _makeRequest via axios
API-->>App: Return API response
App-->>Action: Provide response data and summary
Action-->>Client: Return full API response
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Tip 🌐 Web search-backed reviews and chat
✨ Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (6)
components/dataforseo/dataforseo.app.mjs (2)
7-21: Rename misleading variable for clarity.
Within thelocationCodeprop'sasync options(), the variablelanguageCodesactually refers to location information. Consider renaming it tolocationsor similar for clarity and maintainability.- const languageCodes = response.tasks[0].result; - return languageCodes.map(({ + const locations = response.tasks[0].result; + return locations.map(({
94-108: Consider adding error handling for API failures.
The_makeRequestmethod lacks explicit handling for failed or invalid API responses. You might wrap this in try/catch or check theresponse.statusto handle errors gracefully and provide clearer feedback to end users.components/dataforseo/actions/get-ranked-keywords/get-ranked-keywords.mjs (1)
30-43: Add error handling for unexpected responses.
If the API returns an unexpected structure or an error, the code could break when accessingresponse.tasks[0].status_message. Consider verifying array bounds and status codes for robustness.components/dataforseo/actions/get-keyword-difficulty/get-keyword-difficulty.mjs (1)
30-43: Consider chunking large keyword sets.
Since the maximum number of keywords is 1000, you might chunk or validate the input if a user inadvertently provides more than the allowed limit.components/dataforseo/actions/get-business-listings/get-business-listings.mjs (2)
3-8: LGTM! Consider adding input/output examples in the documentation.The module metadata is well-defined with a clear key, name, description, and version. The documentation link is helpful.
Consider enhancing the documentation by adding example input parameters and expected output format to help users understand the API better.
48-64: Consider adding input validation and error handling.The run method implementation is clean and follows a good pattern. However, there are a few areas for improvement:
- Input validation before making the API call
- Error handling for failed API responses
- More descriptive success message that includes the number of listings retrieved
Here's a suggested improvement:
async run({ $ }) { + // Validate required inputs + if (!this.locationCoordinate) { + throw new Error("Location coordinate is required"); + } + + try { const response = await this.app.getBusinessListings({ $, data: [ { location_coordinate: this.locationCoordinate, categories: this.categories, description: this.description, title: this.title, is_claimed: this.isClaimed, limit: this.limit, }, ], }); - $.export("$summary", `Successfully sent the request. Status: ${response.tasks[0].status_message}`); + const task = response.tasks[0]; + if (task.status_code !== 20000) { + throw new Error(`API request failed: ${task.status_message}`); + } + const count = task.result?.[0]?.items?.length ?? 0; + $.export("$summary", `Successfully retrieved ${count} business listings. Status: ${task.status_message}`); return response; + } catch (error) { + throw new Error(`Failed to get business listings: ${error.message}`); + } },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
components/dataforseo/actions/get-business-listings/get-business-listings.mjs(1 hunks)components/dataforseo/actions/get-keyword-difficulty/get-keyword-difficulty.mjs(1 hunks)components/dataforseo/actions/get-ranked-keywords/get-ranked-keywords.mjs(1 hunks)components/dataforseo/common/constants.mjs(1 hunks)components/dataforseo/dataforseo.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/dataforseo/package.json(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- components/dataforseo/common/constants.mjs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (8)
components/dataforseo/dataforseo.app.mjs (3)
1-3: Imports look correct and align with Pipedream standards.
109-129: Methods appear well-structured and consistent.
No issues found. The design pattern for posting data to each endpoint is correct and consistent with the DataForSEO documentation.
136-140: Optional check for empty results.
When invokingthis.getLocations(), consider verifying thattasksexist in the response. This helps avoid potential runtime errors if the response fails or is missing expected fields.components/dataforseo/actions/get-ranked-keywords/get-ranked-keywords.mjs (1)
3-29: Properties are aligned with the app’s prop definitions.
All references tolocationCode,targetType, andtargetare consistent with the core app.components/dataforseo/actions/get-keyword-difficulty/get-keyword-difficulty.mjs (1)
3-29: Property definitions match the main app.
They correctly mirrorlanguageCode,locationCode, andkeywords.components/dataforseo/actions/get-business-listings/get-business-listings.mjs (1)
9-47: Verify prop definitions in the app module.The props are well-structured and utilize the app module's propDefinitions. However, we should verify that these propDefinitions are properly defined in the app module.
✅ Verification successful
Verification of prop definitions in the app module confirmed.
The grep output shows that every prop definition referenced in
components/dataforseo/actions/get-business-listings/get-business-listings.mjs—namelylocationCoordinate,categories,title,description,isClaimed, andlimit—is properly defined in thecomponents/dataforseo/dataforseo.app.mjsfile.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all propDefinitions referenced in this file exist in the app module # Test: Search for propDefinition declarations in the app module rg -A 2 "locationCoordinate:|categories:|title:|description:|isClaimed:|limit:" components/dataforseo/dataforseo.app.mjsLength of output: 1835
components/dataforseo/package.json (2)
3-3: Verify if version bump is appropriate.The version has been bumped from 0.0.1 to 0.1.0. Since this appears to be adding new features without breaking changes, this follows semantic versioning correctly.
15-17: Verify platform dependency version.The addition of @pipedream/platform dependency looks good, but let's verify if this is the latest compatible version.
✅ Verification successful
Dependency version is up-to-date.
- The npm registry confirms that the latest version of @pipedream/platform is 3.0.3.
- The dependency in
components/dataforseo/package.jsonspecifying"@pipedream/platform": "^3.0.3"correctly aligns with the latest version.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Web query:
What is the latest version of @pipedream/platform package?Length of output: 3137
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @lcaresia lgtm! Ready for QA!
WHY
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Chores