Skip to content

Conversation

@michelle0927
Copy link
Collaborator

@michelle0927 michelle0927 commented Apr 9, 2025

Resolves #16225

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved keyword detection to ensure that missing description data does not cause unexpected errors.
  • Chores

    • Incremented version numbers across modules and the package to maintain consistency and reliability.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 9, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the safety check in the Gemini content generation logic by replacing a direct call to description.includes(keyword) with an optional chaining approach (description?.includes(keyword)), preventing potential runtime errors. Additionally, version numbers have been incremented in both the content generation modules and the package manifest, ensuring consistency across the components. No changes to exported interfaces or overall functionality were made.

Changes

File(s) Summary
components/google_gemini/actions/common/generate-content.mjs Replaced description.includes(keyword) with description?.includes(keyword) to handle null or undefined safely.
components/google_gemini/actions/generate-content-from-text-and-image/generate-content-from-text-and-image.mjs,
components/google_gemini/actions/generate-content-from-text/generate-content.mjs
Bumped version from "0.1.1" to "0.1.2".
components/google_gemini/package.json Updated package version from "0.2.1" to "0.2.2".

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
[BUG] Gemini Model props failed (#16225)

Poem

I'm just a bunny, hopping with glee,
Coding safely so errors won't flee.
Optional chains now guard my code tight,
Version bumps leap into the light.
With whiskers twitching, I celebrate the night!

Warning

There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure.

🔧 ESLint

If the error stems from missing dependencies, add them to the package.json file. For unrecoverable errors (e.g., due to private dependencies), disable the tool in the CodeRabbit configuration.

components/google_gemini/actions/common/generate-content.mjs

Oops! Something went wrong! :(

ESLint: 8.57.1

Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs
at packageResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:839:9)
at moduleResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:908:18)
at defaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:1038:11)
at ModuleLoader.defaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:557:12)
at ModuleLoader.resolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:525:25)
at ModuleLoader.getModuleJob (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:246:38)
at ModuleJob._link (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:126:49)

components/google_gemini/actions/generate-content-from-text-and-image/generate-content-from-text-and-image.mjs

Oops! Something went wrong! :(

ESLint: 8.57.1

Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs
at packageResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:839:9)
at moduleResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:908:18)
at defaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:1038:11)
at ModuleLoader.defaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:557:12)
at ModuleLoader.resolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:525:25)
at ModuleLoader.getModuleJob (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:246:38)
at ModuleJob._link (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:126:49)

components/google_gemini/actions/generate-content-from-text/generate-content-from-text.mjs

Oops! Something went wrong! :(

ESLint: 8.57.1

Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs
at packageResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:839:9)
at moduleResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:908:18)
at defaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/resolve:1038:11)
at ModuleLoader.defaultResolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:557:12)
at ModuleLoader.resolve (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:525:25)
at ModuleLoader.getModuleJob (node:internal/modules/esm/loader:246:38)
at ModuleJob._link (node:internal/modules/esm/module_job:126:49)


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4dbe682 and 2651a0e.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • components/google_gemini/actions/common/generate-content.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/google_gemini/actions/generate-content-from-text-and-image/generate-content-from-text-and-image.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/google_gemini/actions/generate-content-from-text/generate-content-from-text.mjs (1 hunks)
  • components/google_gemini/package.json (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: pnpm publish
  • GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
  • GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
🔇 Additional comments (4)
components/google_gemini/package.json (1)

3-3: Version bump is appropriate for bug fix.

The package version increment from 0.2.1 to 0.2.2 follows semantic versioning principles for a bug fix release.

components/google_gemini/actions/generate-content-from-text-and-image/generate-content-from-text-and-image.mjs (1)

11-11: Component version bump is consistent with package version update.

The version increase from 0.1.1 to 0.1.2 aligns with the bug fix nature of this PR and maintains versioning consistency across components.

components/google_gemini/actions/generate-content-from-text/generate-content-from-text.mjs (1)

9-9: Component version bump is consistent with package version update.

The version increase from 0.1.1 to 0.1.2 aligns with the bug fix nature of this PR and maintains versioning consistency across components.

components/google_gemini/actions/common/generate-content.mjs (1)

18-19: Good fix using optional chaining to prevent potential runtime errors.

Adding the optional chaining operator (?.) prevents a TypeError when description is null or undefined. This defensive programming approach safely handles cases where model metadata might be incomplete.

Without this fix, the code would throw an error if a model's description was missing. The PR correctly addresses issue #16225 by making the code more robust.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Apr 9, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

3 Skipped Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
docs-v2 ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Apr 9, 2025 4:29pm
pipedream-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Apr 9, 2025 4:29pm
pipedream-docs-redirect-do-not-edit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Apr 9, 2025 4:29pm

@michelle0927 michelle0927 merged commit 34ef7ac into master Apr 11, 2025
11 checks passed
@michelle0927 michelle0927 deleted the issue-16225 branch April 11, 2025 14:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Gemini Model props failed

3 participants