[BUG] Special characters are potentially breaking the searchName prop… #16897
Conversation
… for Google Drive Actions
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
Important Review skippedReview was skipped due to path filters ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
CodeRabbit blocks several paths by default. You can override this behavior by explicitly including those paths in the path filters. For example, including You can disable this status message by setting the WalkthroughThe changes update the Google Drive Find Folder action to version 0.1.9, introducing escaping for single quotes in the search term to prevent query errors. Error handling is improved by wrapping the API call in a try-catch block, logging detailed error information, and providing a clear summary message. The package version is also incremented. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant FindFolderAction
participant GoogleDriveAPI
User->>FindFolderAction: Provide searchName input
FindFolderAction->>FindFolderAction: Escape single quotes in searchName
FindFolderAction->>GoogleDriveAPI: Query for folders with escaped searchName
alt Success
GoogleDriveAPI-->>FindFolderAction: Return folders list
FindFolderAction->>User: Return summary with folder count
else Failure
GoogleDriveAPI-->>FindFolderAction: Return error
FindFolderAction->>FindFolderAction: Log error details
FindFolderAction->>User: Throw stringified error message
end
Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
components/google_drive/actions/find-folder/find-folder.mjs (1)
46-55: Improved error handling with minor concerns.The try-catch block adds valuable error handling and the success path correctly exports a summary. However, there are a couple of considerations:
- Potential information disclosure: Logging
error.response?.data?.errormight expose sensitive API details in logs.- Error throwing approach: Throwing a JSON stringified error is unconventional - typically you'd throw an Error object.
Consider this approach for more secure and conventional error handling:
} catch (error) { - console.log("Failed to find folders with query", error.response?.data?.error || error); - throw JSON.stringify(error.response?.data?.error, null, 2); + console.log("Failed to find folders with query:", error.message); + throw new Error(`Failed to find folders: ${error.response?.data?.error?.message || error.message}`); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
components/google_drive/actions/find-folder/find-folder.mjs(2 hunks)components/google_drive/package.json(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: pnpm publish
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
🔇 Additional comments (3)
components/google_drive/package.json (1)
3-3: LGTM! Appropriate semantic versioning.The patch version bump correctly reflects a bug fix for special character handling.
components/google_drive/actions/find-folder/find-folder.mjs (2)
10-10: LGTM! Version increment aligns with bug fix.The action version bump to 0.1.9 appropriately reflects the bug fix for special character handling.
38-38: LGTM! Proper integration of escaped search term.The query construction correctly uses the escaped search term, preventing potential syntax errors in the Google Drive API call.
luancazarine
left a comment
luancazarine
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi @jcortes, LGTM! Ready for QA!
… for Google Drive Actions
WHY
Resolves #16886
Summary by CodeRabbit
Bug Fixes
Chores