New Components - changes_page #16988
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎ 3 Skipped Deployments
|
WalkthroughThis update introduces a new Changes Page integration, adding comprehensive API interaction methods, four new actions for retrieving posts, and a polling source to emit events for new posts. The implementation includes pagination support, dynamic property options, and error handling, along with package dependency updates and versioning changes. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Action
participant ChangesPageApp
participant ChangesPageAPI
User->>Action: Trigger action (e.g., Get Post)
Action->>ChangesPageApp: Call API method (e.g., getPost)
ChangesPageApp->>ChangesPageAPI: HTTP request to endpoint
ChangesPageAPI-->>ChangesPageApp: Return post data
ChangesPageApp-->>Action: Return processed data
Action-->>User: Output result
sequenceDiagram
participant Source
participant ChangesPageApp
participant ChangesPageAPI
participant DB
Source->>DB: Get last processed timestamp
Source->>ChangesPageApp: Fetch posts (paginated)
ChangesPageApp->>ChangesPageAPI: HTTP request to list posts
ChangesPageAPI-->>ChangesPageApp: Return posts
ChangesPageApp-->>Source: Return posts
Source->>DB: Update last processed timestamp
Source-->>User: Emit new post events
Assessment against linked issues
Assessment against linked issues: Out-of-scope changes
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
components/changes_page/changes_page.app.mjsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs components/changes_page/actions/get-pinned-post/get-pinned-post.mjsOops! Something went wrong! :( ESLint: 8.57.1 Error [ERR_MODULE_NOT_FOUND]: Cannot find package 'jsonc-eslint-parser' imported from /eslint.config.mjs ✨ Finishing Touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
components/changes_page/changes_page.app.mjs (1)
12-17: Pass the $ parameter for consistent logging support.The
listPostscall should include the$parameter to support Pipedream's logging and debugging features.- const posts = await this.listPosts({ + const posts = await this.listPosts({ + $: this, params: { offset: page * DEFAULT_LIMIT, }, });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
components/changes_page/actions/get-latest-post/get-latest-post.mjs(1 hunks)components/changes_page/actions/get-pinned-post/get-pinned-post.mjs(1 hunks)components/changes_page/actions/get-post/get-post.mjs(1 hunks)components/changes_page/actions/list-posts/list-posts.mjs(1 hunks)components/changes_page/changes_page.app.mjs(1 hunks)components/changes_page/package.json(2 hunks)components/changes_page/sources/new-post-created/new-post-created.mjs(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
🔇 Additional comments (7)
components/changes_page/package.json (2)
3-3: LGTM: Appropriate version bump for new functionality.The version increment from "0.0.1" to "0.1.0" appropriately reflects the substantial new functionality being added (multiple actions and a source component).
15-17: LGTM: Required dependency addition.The "@pipedream/platform" dependency is correctly added to support the
DEFAULT_POLLING_SOURCE_TIMER_INTERVALimport used in the new source component.components/changes_page/actions/get-post/get-post.mjs (1)
1-26: LGTM: Well-structured action component.The implementation correctly follows Pipedream action patterns:
- Proper app import and propDefinition usage for dynamic options
- Standard async/await pattern with $ context
- Appropriate summary export and return value
- Clean separation of concerns by delegating API calls to the app layer
components/changes_page/actions/get-latest-post/get-latest-post.mjs (1)
1-19: LGTM: Clean and consistent action implementation.The get-latest-post action follows the same well-established pattern as other actions, with appropriate simplicity since no parameters are required.
components/changes_page/sources/new-post-created/new-post-created.mjs (3)
21-34: LGTM: Excellent state management and event generation.The timestamp tracking and event metadata generation are well-implemented:
- Proper database usage for persistent state
- Good event metadata structure with id, summary, and timestamp
- Efficient timestamp comparison logic
59-66: LGTM: Appropriate deployment and runtime configuration.The deploy hook fetching 25 initial posts and the unlimited runtime polling provide good balance between initial setup and ongoing monitoring.
35-57:❓ Verification inconclusive
Verify API post ordering assumptions.
The implementation assumes posts are returned in chronological order (newest first) when it:
- Uses
posts[0].created_atto get the newest timestamp (line 52)- Breaks the loop when finding an older post (lines 43-47)
- Reverses posts before emitting (line 53)
While this logic appears sound, ensure the Changes Page API guarantees chronological ordering to prevent missing posts.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify Changes Page API documentation for post ordering behavior # Expected: Find documentation confirming posts are returned chronologically # Search for API documentation patterns that might indicate ordering rg -i "order|sort|chronolog|newest|latest" --type mdLength of output: 68010
Verify API post ordering assumptions
The current implementation in
components/changes_page/sources/new-post-created/new-post-created.mjs(lines 35–57) relies on the Changes Page API returning posts in descending chronological order:
- Using
posts[0].created_atas the newest timestamp- Breaking out of the pagination loop once an older post is encountered
- Reversing
postsbefore emitting to preserve chronological emissionWe didn’t find any in-repo documentation confirming this ordering. To avoid missed or out-of-order posts, please either:
- Confirm with the API documentation or API maintainers that posts are guaranteed newest-first
- Or explicitly sort the fetched posts by
created_atdescending before processing
components/changes_page/actions/get-pinned-post/get-pinned-post.mjs
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
components/changes_page/changes_page.app.mjs (1)
70-86: Pagination logic issue remains unresolved.The pagination termination logic still has the same issue identified in the previous review. The early break condition helps but doesn't fully address the core problem where
total === DEFAULT_LIMITcould cause unnecessary API calls.The suggested fix from the previous review should still be applied to improve the pagination logic and prevent edge cases where exactly
DEFAULT_LIMITitems are returned.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
components/changes_page/changes_page.app.mjs (1)
88-95: Consider memory usage implications for large datasets.The
getPaginatedResourcesmethod collects all paginated items into an array, which could consume significant memory for large datasets. Consider adding an optional limit parameter or documenting memory considerations.-async getPaginatedResources(opts = {}) { +async getPaginatedResources({ maxItems, ...opts } = {}) { const resources = this.paginate(opts); const items = []; for await (const item of resources) { items.push(item); + if (maxItems && items.length >= maxItems) { + break; + } } return items; },
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
components/changes_page/actions/get-pinned-post/get-pinned-post.mjs(1 hunks)components/changes_page/changes_page.app.mjs(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- components/changes_page/actions/get-pinned-post/get-pinned-post.mjs
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
- GitHub Check: Publish TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Verify TypeScript components
- GitHub Check: Lint Code Base
🔇 Additional comments (3)
components/changes_page/changes_page.app.mjs (3)
1-2: LGTM! Clean imports and sensible constant definition.The axios import and DEFAULT_LIMIT constant are appropriate for this API integration.
29-36: LGTM! Well-structured base request method.The
_makeRequestmethod follows good patterns for API client design with proper parameter spreading and axios integration.
37-62: LGTM! API methods are well-structured and follow REST conventions.The API endpoint methods (
getPost,getLatestPost,getPinnedPost,listPosts) are clean, consistent, and follow proper REST API patterns.
jcortes
left a comment
jcortes
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi @michelle0927 lgtm! Ready for QA!
Resolves #16947
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Improvements
Chores