Include the Boostagram Specification in this Repository #506
Closed
Alwin-Stockinger
started this conversation in
Enhancement Proposal
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Yes, please do this. As soon as you do it I will propose the return address as a PR on this repo instead. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Sender key sounds sounds a lot like what @daveajones is proposing (just an observed bonus) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I think the specification for Boostagrams should be moved to the podcast-namespace repository (instead of being managed in https://github.com/lightning/blips/blob/master/blip-0010.md). Discussions on enhancing or relating to it are already taking place in this repository, see for example:
Blip 10 (the current specification) suffers from duplicate fields (for example
time
andts
) and loosely explained fields such asuuid
. I think iterating and improving the spec would be easier if Boostagrams would be defined in this repository.There are also some (to my knowledge) unused fields such as
signature
andsender_key
which could be removed if deemed unnecessary or reintroduced with a useful purpose.If there is support for this I will make a Pull Request that includes the spec in this repository.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions