You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: _posts/2024-05-30-counting.md
+5-5Lines changed: 5 additions & 5 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ One of our goals at Polymathic-AI is to utilize the recent advances in machine l
18
18
19
19
In this blog post, we summarize a recent paper which is part of an ongoing effort in our team in this direction. In this work, we introduced a new toy problem specifically designed to advance the interpretability of Transformer models in quantitative and scientific contexts. This task, called **contextual counting**, requires the model to identify a specific region of interest within a dataset and perform accurate counting. As such, it simulates scenarios where precise localization and subsequent computation are critical, such as in object detection or region-based analysis in scientific data.
20
20
21
-
21
+
<br>
22
22
## Introducing the Contextual Counting Task
23
23
<br>
24
24
In this task, the input is a sequence composed of zeros, ones, and square bracket delimiters: `{0, 1, [, ]}`. Each sample sequence contains ones and zeros with several regions marked by the delimiters. The task is to count the number of ones within each delimited region. For example, given the sequence:
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ Toy problems serve as simplified models that help us understand complex systems.
55
55
56
56
Moreover, toy problems are instrumental in benchmarking and testing new theories and methods. They act as proving grounds for hypotheses about model behavior and performance. For instance, by using toy problems, researchers can quickly iterate on models and interpretability techniques, refining their approaches before deploying them on more sophisticated and critical tasks. This iterative process accelerates the development of robust methods that can be confidently applied in high-stakes domains like healthcare, finance, and scientific research. In the context of Transformers, toy problems help uncover how different architectures and encoding methods influence model performance and interpretability, providing essential knowledge for advancing machine learning technologies.
57
57
58
-
58
+
<br>
59
59
## Theoretical Insights
60
60
<br>
61
61
We provide some theoretical insights into the problem, showing that a Transformer with one causal encoding layer and one decoding layer can solve the contextual counting task for arbitrary sequence lengths and numbers of regions.
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ For non-causal (bidirectional) Transformers, the task is more complicated:
88
88
These propositions highlight the difficulties non-causal Transformers face in solving this task.
89
89
90
90
91
-
91
+
<br>
92
92
## Experimental Results
93
93
<br>
94
94
The theoretical results above imply that exact solutions exist but do not clarify whether or not such solutions can indeed be found when the model is trained via SGD. We therefore trained various Transformer architectures on this task. Inspired by the theoretical arguments, we use an encoder-decoder architecture, with one layer and one head for each. A typical output of the network is shown in the following image where the model outputs the probability distribution over the number of ones in each region.
@@ -177,12 +177,12 @@ If you made it this far, here is an interesting bonus point:
177
177
* Even though the model has access to the number n through its attention profile, it still does not construct a probability distribution that is sharply peaked at n. As we see in the above figure, as n gets large, this probability distribution gets wider. This, we believe is partly the side-effect of this specific solution where two curves are being balanced against each other. But it is partly a general problem that as the number of tokens that are attended to gets large, we need higher accuracy to be able to infer n exactly. This is because the information about n is coded non-linearly after the attention layer. In this case, if we assume that the model attends to BoS and 1-tokens equally the output becomes:
178
178
179
179
<palign="center">
180
-
<imgsrc="/images/blog/counting/n_dependence.png"alt="The n-dependence of the model output."width="55%"style="mix-blend-mode: darken;">
180
+
<imgsrc="/images/blog/counting/n_dependence.png"alt="The n-dependence of the model output."width="25%"style="mix-blend-mode: darken;">
181
181
</p>
182
182
183
183
We see that as n becomes large, the difference between n and n+1 becomes smaller.
184
184
185
-
185
+
<br>
186
186
## Conclusion
187
187
<br>
188
188
The contextual counting task provides a valuable framework for exploring the interpretability of Transformers in scientific and quantitative contexts. Our experiments show that causal Transformers with NoPE can effectively solve this task, while non-causal models struggle. These findings highlight the importance of task-specific interpretability challenges and the potential for developing more robust and generalizable models for scientific applications.
0 commit comments