Replies: 1 comment
-
based on that affine, the initial spacing is actually computed as (0.6250, 2.3992, 0.6279) instead of (0.625 0.625 2.4):
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Describe the bug
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.
I wanted to resample my data, but the function didn't work the way I wanted. I'm not sure if it's a bug in the function or if I'm using it incorrectly.
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Expected behavior
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.
I expect the shape to scale from [0.65 0.65 2.4] to [0.3 0.3 2].
Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.
Environment
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions