Merge pull request #3857 from blnicho/fix-mumps

Relax mumps reallocation test

Author: mrmundt

doc/OnlineDocs/explanation/solvers/pynumero/tutorial.linear_solver_interfaces.rst

@@ -67,10 +67,10 @@ Interface to MUMPS
           [-1.        , -1.        , -1.        ,  0.        ,  0.        ]])
    >>> rhs = np.array([-0.67025575, -1.2,  0.1,  1.14872127,  1.25])
    >>> solver = MumpsCentralizedAssembledLinearSolver(sym=2, par=1, comm=None)  # symmetric matrix; solve in serial
-   >>> solver.do_symbolic_factorization(A)
-   >>> solver.do_numeric_factorization(A)
-   >>> x = solver.do_back_solve(rhs)
+   >>> status = solver.do_symbolic_factorization(A)
+   >>> status = solver.do_numeric_factorization(A)
+   >>> x, status = solver.do_back_solve(rhs)
    >>> np.max(np.abs(A*x - rhs)) <= 1e-15
-   True
+   np.True_
 
 Of course, SciPy solvers can also be used. See SciPy documentation for details.

pyomo/contrib/interior_point/tests/test_realloc.py

@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ def test_mumps(self):
         # As of Mumps 5.6.2, predicted == 9, which is lower than the
         # default actual of 10.8
         # self.assertTrue(predicted == 12 or predicted == 11)
-        self.assertTrue(actual > predicted)
+        self.assertTrue(actual >= predicted)
         # NOTE: This test will break if Mumps (or your Mumps version)
         # gets more conservative at estimating memory requirement,
         # or if the numeric factorization gets more efficient.