You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/faq.rst
+4-9Lines changed: 4 additions & 9 deletions
Display the source diff
Display the rich diff
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -118,10 +118,7 @@ Maturity
118
118
How well has it been tested?
119
119
----------------------------
120
120
121
-
``future`` is used by several major projects, including `mezzanine
122
-
<http://mezzanine.jupo.org>`_ and `ObsPy <http://www.obspy.org>`_. It is also
123
-
currently being used to help with porting 800,000 lines of Python 2 code in
124
-
`Sage <http://sagemath.org>`_ to Python 2/3.
121
+
``future`` is used by thousands of projects and has been downloaded over 1.7 billion times. Some projects like Sage have used it to port 800,000+ lines of Python 2 code to Python 2/3.
125
122
126
123
Currently ``python-future`` has over 1000 unit tests. Many of these are straight
127
124
from the Python 3.3 and 3.4 test suites.
@@ -135,10 +132,8 @@ expanded.
135
132
Is the API stable?
136
133
------------------
137
134
138
-
Not yet; ``future`` is still in beta. Where possible, we will try not to break
139
-
anything which was documented and used to work. After version 1.0 is released,
140
-
the API will not change in backward-incompatible ways until a hypothetical
141
-
version 2.0.
135
+
Yes; ``future`` is mature. We'll make very few changes from here, trying not to
136
+
break anything which was documented and used to work.
142
137
143
138
..
144
139
Are there any example of Python 2 packages ported to Python 3 using ``future`` and ``futurize``?
@@ -288,7 +283,7 @@ Support
288
283
Is there a mailing list?
289
284
------------------------
290
285
291
-
There was (`python-porting`), but it's now dead.
286
+
There was a `python-porting` mailing list, but it's now dead.
0 commit comments