You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{cite:t}`leysieffer1976randomized` recommend a two-dimensional measure of jeopardy that reduces to a single dimension when there is no jeopardy in a 'no' answer, which means that
550
+
{cite:t}`leysieffer1976respondent` recommend a two-dimensional measure of jeopardy that reduces to a single dimension when there is no jeopardy in a 'no' answer, which means that
551
551
552
552
553
553
$$
@@ -562,7 +562,7 @@ $$
562
562
563
563
This is not an optimal choice under a utilitarian approach.
564
564
565
-
### Analysis on the Method of {cite:t}`chaudhuri1988randomized`
565
+
### Analysis on the Method of {cite:t}`Chadhuri_Mukerjee_88`
566
566
567
567
{cite}`Chadhuri_Mukerjee_88` argued that the individual may find that since "yes" may sometimes relate to the sensitive group A, a clever respondent may falsely but safely always be inclined to respond "no".
0 commit comments