-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
Added default unit value for current #75
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…nt unit parameter for model files
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @Woojin-Crive, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request introduces a standardization of current unit definitions across various Dynamixel motor model files. It updates the package version and changelog to reflect the addition of default 'Present Current' and 'Goal Current' parameters, ensuring consistency in how current values are handled within the system's motor configurations.
Highlights
- Package Version Update: The
package.xmlfile has been updated to reflect the new version1.4.13for thedynamixel_hardware_interfacepackage. - Changelog Entry: The
CHANGELOG.rstfile now includes an entry for version1.4.13, explicitly stating that default parameters for current units have been added to model files. - Standardization of Current Units in Model Files: A significant number of Dynamixel motor model files (
.modelfiles) have been modified to include default 'Present Current' and 'Goal Current' entries. These entries standardize the current unit as 'raw' with a default value of 1.0 across various motor types.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request adds default unit values for current to a large number of Dynamixel model files. While the intention is good, the implementation has a critical flaw. The conversion factor for current is set to 1.0 for all models, which is incorrect. This will lead to wrong current readings and commands, as the raw values from the motors will be interpreted directly as Amperes.
I've left a specific comment on one of the model files (xh430_w210.model) with a detailed explanation and a suggested fix. This issue applies to all model files modified in this PR that support current control. Each model has a specific conversion factor for current, which can be found in its datasheet, and this value must be used instead of 1.0.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Confirmed the reason for adding the current constant.
…y hardware interface references
Added default unit value for current