Skip to content

Conversation

@Woojin-Crive
Copy link
Member

Added default unit value for current

@Woojin-Crive Woojin-Crive self-assigned this Aug 13, 2025
@Woojin-Crive Woojin-Crive added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 13, 2025
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to 🌱 Todo in Platform Aug 13, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @Woojin-Crive, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a standardization of current unit definitions across various Dynamixel motor model files. It updates the package version and changelog to reflect the addition of default 'Present Current' and 'Goal Current' parameters, ensuring consistency in how current values are handled within the system's motor configurations.

Highlights

  • Package Version Update: The package.xml file has been updated to reflect the new version 1.4.13 for the dynamixel_hardware_interface package.
  • Changelog Entry: The CHANGELOG.rst file now includes an entry for version 1.4.13, explicitly stating that default parameters for current units have been added to model files.
  • Standardization of Current Units in Model Files: A significant number of Dynamixel motor model files (.model files) have been modified to include default 'Present Current' and 'Goal Current' entries. These entries standardize the current unit as 'raw' with a default value of 1.0 across various motor types.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@Woojin-Crive Woojin-Crive moved this from 🌱 Todo to 📝 Pull Request in Platform Aug 13, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds default unit values for current to a large number of Dynamixel model files. While the intention is good, the implementation has a critical flaw. The conversion factor for current is set to 1.0 for all models, which is incorrect. This will lead to wrong current readings and commands, as the raw values from the motors will be interpreted directly as Amperes.

I've left a specific comment on one of the model files (xh430_w210.model) with a detailed explanation and a suggested fix. This issue applies to all model files modified in this PR that support current control. Each model has a specific conversion factor for current, which can be found in its datasheet, and this value must be used instead of 1.0.

Copy link
Member

@sunghowoo sunghowoo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Confirmed the reason for adding the current constant.

@Woojin-Crive Woojin-Crive merged commit e483254 into main Aug 13, 2025
11 checks passed
@Woojin-Crive Woojin-Crive deleted the feature-default-current-unit branch August 13, 2025 04:37
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 📝 Pull Request to 🚩Done in Platform Aug 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

Archived in project

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants