merge main into amd-staging

Author: z1-cciauto

clang-tools-extra/clang-include-fixer/find-all-symbols/STLPostfixHeaderMap.cpp

@@ -606,6 +606,9 @@ const HeaderMapCollector::RegexHeaderMap *getSTLPostfixHeaderMap() {
       {"sys/xattr.h$", "<sys/xattr.h>"},
       {"bits/epoll.h$", "<sys/epoll.h>"},
       {"bits/eventfd.h$", "<sys/eventfd.h>"},
+      {"bits/getopt_core.h$", "<getopt.h>"},
+      {"bits/getopt_ext.h$", "<getopt.h>"},
+      {"bits/getopt_posix.h$", "<getopt.h>"},
       {"bits/inotify.h$", "<sys/inotify.h>"},
       {"bits/ipc.h$", "<sys/ipc.h>"},
       {"bits/ipctypes.h$", "<sys/ipc.h>"},

clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/misc/IncludeCleanerCheck.cpp

@@ -59,7 +59,9 @@ IncludeCleanerCheck::IncludeCleanerCheck(StringRef Name,
     : ClangTidyCheck(Name, Context),
       IgnoreHeaders(
           utils::options::parseStringList(Options.get("IgnoreHeaders", ""))),
-      DeduplicateFindings(Options.get("DeduplicateFindings", true)) {
+      DeduplicateFindings(Options.get("DeduplicateFindings", true)),
+      UnusedIncludes(Options.get("UnusedIncludes", true)),
+      MissingIncludes(Options.get("MissingIncludes", true)) {
   for (const auto &Header : IgnoreHeaders) {
     if (!llvm::Regex{Header}.isValid())
       configurationDiag("Invalid ignore headers regex '%0'") << Header;
@@ -68,12 +70,19 @@ IncludeCleanerCheck::IncludeCleanerCheck(StringRef Name,
       HeaderSuffix += "$";
     IgnoreHeadersRegex.emplace_back(HeaderSuffix);
   }
+
+  if (UnusedIncludes == false && MissingIncludes == false)
+    this->configurationDiag("The check 'misc-include-cleaner' will not "
+                            "perform any analysis because 'UnusedIncludes' and "
+                            "'MissingIncludes' are both false.");
 }
 
 void IncludeCleanerCheck::storeOptions(ClangTidyOptions::OptionMap &Opts) {
   Options.store(Opts, "IgnoreHeaders",
                 utils::options::serializeStringList(IgnoreHeaders));
   Options.store(Opts, "DeduplicateFindings", DeduplicateFindings);
+  Options.store(Opts, "UnusedIncludes", UnusedIncludes);
+  Options.store(Opts, "MissingIncludes", MissingIncludes);
 }
 
 bool IncludeCleanerCheck::isLanguageVersionSupported(
@@ -200,39 +209,43 @@ void IncludeCleanerCheck::check(const MatchFinder::MatchResult &Result) {
   if (!FileStyle)
     FileStyle = format::getLLVMStyle();
 
-  for (const auto *Inc : Unused) {
-    diag(Inc->HashLocation, "included header %0 is not used directly")
-        << llvm::sys::path::filename(Inc->Spelled,
-                                     llvm::sys::path::Style::posix)
-        << FixItHint::CreateRemoval(CharSourceRange::getCharRange(
-               SM->translateLineCol(SM->getMainFileID(), Inc->Line, 1),
-               SM->translateLineCol(SM->getMainFileID(), Inc->Line + 1, 1)));
+  if (UnusedIncludes) {
+    for (const auto *Inc : Unused) {
+      diag(Inc->HashLocation, "included header %0 is not used directly")
+          << llvm::sys::path::filename(Inc->Spelled,
+                                       llvm::sys::path::Style::posix)
+          << FixItHint::CreateRemoval(CharSourceRange::getCharRange(
+                 SM->translateLineCol(SM->getMainFileID(), Inc->Line, 1),
+                 SM->translateLineCol(SM->getMainFileID(), Inc->Line + 1, 1)));
+    }
   }
 
-  tooling::HeaderIncludes HeaderIncludes(getCurrentMainFile(), Code,
-                                         FileStyle->IncludeStyle);
-  // Deduplicate insertions when running in bulk fix mode.
-  llvm::StringSet<> InsertedHeaders{};
-  for (const auto &Inc : Missing) {
-    std::string Spelling = include_cleaner::spellHeader(
-        {Inc.Missing, PP->getHeaderSearchInfo(), MainFile});
-    bool Angled = llvm::StringRef{Spelling}.starts_with("<");
-    // We might suggest insertion of an existing include in edge cases, e.g.,
-    // include is present in a PP-disabled region, or spelling of the header
-    // turns out to be the same as one of the unresolved includes in the
-    // main file.
-    if (auto Replacement =
-            HeaderIncludes.insert(llvm::StringRef{Spelling}.trim("\"<>"),
-                                  Angled, tooling::IncludeDirective::Include)) {
-      DiagnosticBuilder DB =
-          diag(SM->getSpellingLoc(Inc.SymRef.RefLocation),
-               "no header providing \"%0\" is directly included")
-          << Inc.SymRef.Target.name();
-      if (areDiagsSelfContained() ||
-          InsertedHeaders.insert(Replacement->getReplacementText()).second) {
-        DB << FixItHint::CreateInsertion(
-            SM->getComposedLoc(SM->getMainFileID(), Replacement->getOffset()),
-            Replacement->getReplacementText());
+  if (MissingIncludes) {
+    tooling::HeaderIncludes HeaderIncludes(getCurrentMainFile(), Code,
+                                           FileStyle->IncludeStyle);
+    // Deduplicate insertions when running in bulk fix mode.
+    llvm::StringSet<> InsertedHeaders{};
+    for (const auto &Inc : Missing) {
+      std::string Spelling = include_cleaner::spellHeader(
+          {Inc.Missing, PP->getHeaderSearchInfo(), MainFile});
+      bool Angled = llvm::StringRef{Spelling}.starts_with("<");
+      // We might suggest insertion of an existing include in edge cases, e.g.,
+      // include is present in a PP-disabled region, or spelling of the header
+      // turns out to be the same as one of the unresolved includes in the
+      // main file.
+      if (auto Replacement = HeaderIncludes.insert(
+              llvm::StringRef{Spelling}.trim("\"<>"), Angled,
+              tooling::IncludeDirective::Include)) {
+        DiagnosticBuilder DB =
+            diag(SM->getSpellingLoc(Inc.SymRef.RefLocation),
+                 "no header providing \"%0\" is directly included")
+            << Inc.SymRef.Target.name();
+        if (areDiagsSelfContained() ||
+            InsertedHeaders.insert(Replacement->getReplacementText()).second) {
+          DB << FixItHint::CreateInsertion(
+              SM->getComposedLoc(SM->getMainFileID(), Replacement->getOffset()),
+              Replacement->getReplacementText());
+        }
       }
     }
   }

clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/misc/IncludeCleanerCheck.h

@@ -47,6 +47,10 @@ class IncludeCleanerCheck : public ClangTidyCheck {
   std::vector<StringRef> IgnoreHeaders;
   // Whether emit only one finding per usage of a symbol.
   const bool DeduplicateFindings;
+  // Whether to report unused includes.
+  const bool UnusedIncludes;
+  // Whether to report missing includes.
+  const bool MissingIncludes;
   llvm::SmallVector<llvm::Regex> IgnoreHeadersRegex;
   bool shouldIgnore(const include_cleaner::Header &H);
 };

clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/modernize/PassByValueCheck.cpp

@@ -166,9 +166,8 @@ static bool hasRValueOverload(const CXXConstructorDecl *Ctor,
   };
 
   for (const auto *Candidate : Record->ctors()) {
-    if (IsRValueOverload(Candidate)) {
+    if (IsRValueOverload(Candidate))
       return true;
-    }
   }
   return false;
 }

clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/modernize/PassByValueCheck.h

@@ -12,8 +12,6 @@
 #include "../ClangTidyCheck.h"
 #include "../utils/IncludeInserter.h"
 
-#include <memory>
-
 namespace clang::tidy::modernize {
 
 class PassByValueCheck : public ClangTidyCheck {

clang-tools-extra/clangd/index/CanonicalIncludes.cpp

@@ -621,6 +621,9 @@ const std::pair<llvm::StringRef, llvm::StringRef> IncludeMappings[] = {
     {"sys/xattr.h", "<sys/xattr.h>"},
     {"bits/epoll.h", "<sys/epoll.h>"},
     {"bits/eventfd.h", "<sys/eventfd.h>"},
+    {"bits/getopt_core.h", "<getopt.h>"},
+    {"bits/getopt_ext.h", "<getopt.h>"},
+    {"bits/getopt_posix.h", "<getopt.h>"},
     {"bits/inotify.h", "<sys/inotify.h>"},
     {"bits/ipc.h", "<sys/ipc.h>"},
     {"bits/ipctypes.h", "<sys/ipc.h>"},

clang-tools-extra/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst

@@ -184,6 +184,11 @@ Changes in existing checks
   `AnalyzePointers` option and fixing false positives when using const array
   type.
 
+- Improved :doc:`misc-include-cleaner
+  <clang-tidy/checks/misc/include-cleaner>` check by adding the options
+  `UnusedIncludes` and `MissingIncludes`, which specify whether the check should
+  report unused or missing includes respectively.
+
 - Improved :doc:`misc-redundant-expression
   <clang-tidy/checks/misc/redundant-expression>` check by providing additional
   examples and fixing some macro related false positives.
@@ -208,7 +213,7 @@ Changes in existing checks
   diagnosing designated initializers for ``std::array`` initializations.
 
 - Improved :doc:`modernize-use-ranges
-  <clang-tidy/checks/modernize/use-ranges>` check by updating suppress 
+  <clang-tidy/checks/modernize/use-ranges>` check by updating suppress
   warnings logic for ``nullptr`` in ``std::find``.
 
 - Improved :doc:`modernize-use-starts-ends-with

clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/misc/include-cleaner.rst

@@ -38,3 +38,14 @@ Options
 
    A boolean that controls whether the check should deduplicate findings for the
    same symbol. Defaults to `true`.
+
+.. option:: UnusedIncludes
+
+   A boolean that controls whether the check should report unused includes
+   (includes that are not used directly). Defaults to `true`.
+
+.. option:: MissingIncludes
+
+   A boolean that controls whether the check should report missing includes
+   (header files from which symbols are used but which are not directly included).
+   Defaults to `true`.

clang-tools-extra/include-cleaner/lib/WalkAST.cpp

@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ class ASTWalker : public RecursiveASTVisitor<ASTWalker> {
   }
 
   bool VisitCleanupAttr(CleanupAttr *attr) {
-    report(attr->getLocation(), attr->getFunctionDecl());
+    report(attr->getArgLoc(), attr->getFunctionDecl());
     return true;
   }
 

clang-tools-extra/include-cleaner/unittests/WalkASTTest.cpp

@@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ TEST(WalkAST, OperatorNewDelete) {
 
 TEST(WalkAST, CleanupAttr) {
   testWalk("void* $explicit^freep(void *p);",
-           "void foo() { __attribute__((^__cleanup__(freep))) char* x = 0; }");
+           "void foo() { __attribute__((__cleanup__(^freep))) char* x = 0; }");
 }
 
 } // namespace