You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
feat: Add initial support for screen readers (experimental) (#9280)
## The basics
- [x] I [validated my changes](https://developers.google.com/blockly/guides/contribute/core#making_and_verifying_a_change)
## The details
### Resolves
Fixes part of #8207
Fixes part of #3370
### Proposed Changes
This introduces initial broad ARIA integration in order to enable at least basic screen reader support when using keyboard navigation.
Largely this involves introducing ARIA roles and labels in a bunch of places, sometimes done in a way to override normal built-in behaviors of the accessibility node tree in order to get a richer first-class output for Blockly (such as for blocks and workspaces).
### Reason for Changes
ARIA is the fundamental basis for configuring how focusable nodes in Blockly are represented to the user when using a screen reader. As such, all focusable nodes requires labels and roles in order to correctly communicate their contexts.
The specific approach taken in this PR is to simply add labels and roles to all nodes where obvious with some extra work done for `WorkspaceSvg` and `BlockSvg` in order to represent blocks as a tree (since that seems to be the best fitting ARIA role per those available: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Accessibility/ARIA/Reference/Roles). The custom work specifically for blocks includes:
- Overriding the role description to be 'block' rather than 'tree item' (which is the default).
- Overriding the position, level, and number of sibling counts since those are normally determined based on the DOM tree and blocks are not laid out in the tree the same way they are visually or logically (so these computations were incorrect). This is also the reason for a bunch of extra computation logic being introduced.
One note on some of the labels being nonsensical (e.g. 'DoNotOverride?'): this was done intentionally to try and ensure _all_ focusable nodes (that can be focused) have labels, even when the specifics of what that label should be aren't yet clear. More components had these temporary labels until testing revealed how exactly they would behave from a screen reader perspective (at which point their roles and labels were updated as needed). The temporary labels act as an indicator when navigating through the UI, and some of the nodes can't easily be reached (for reasons) and thus may never actually need a label. More work is needed in understanding both what components need labels and what those labels should be, but that will be done beyond this PR.
### Test Coverage
No tests are added to this as it's experimental and not a final implementation.
The keyboard navigation tests are failing due to a visibility expansion of `connectionCandidate` in `BlockDragStrategy`. There's no way to avoid this breakage, unfortunately. Instead, this PR will be merged and then RaspberryPiFoundation/blockly-keyboard-experimentation#684 will be finalized and merged to fix it. There's some additional work that will happen both in that branch and in a later PR in core Blockly to integrate the two experimentation branches as part of #9283 so that CI passes correctly for both branches.
### Documentation
No documentation is needed at this time.
### Additional Information
This work is experimental and is meant to serve two purposes:
- Provide a foundation for testing and iterating the core screen reader experience in Blockly.
- Provide a reference point for designing a long-term solution that accounts for all requirements collected during user testing.
This code should never be merged into `develop` as it stands. Instead, it will be redesigned with maintainability, testing, and correctness in mind at a future date (see RaspberryPiFoundation/blockly-keyboard-experimentation#673).
// If the block is currently being moved, announce the new block label so that the user understands where it is now.
1978
+
// TODO: Figure out how much recomputeAriaTreeItemDetailsRecursively needs to anticipate position if it won't be reannounced, and how much of that context should be included in the liveannouncement.
0 commit comments