You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
* escape one tests for valgrind
* increment skipped count
* escape proper one
* make test robust to valgrind numerical issues
---------
Co-authored-by: Michael Chirico <[email protected]>
cat("\n**** Skipping 7 NaN/NA algo='exact' tests because .Machine$longdouble.digits==", .Machine$longdouble.digits, " (!=64); e.g. under valgrind\n\n", sep="")
14
+
cat("\n**** Skipping 8 NaN/NA algo='exact' tests because .Machine$longdouble.digits==", .Machine$longdouble.digits, " (!=64); e.g. under valgrind\n\n", sep="")
15
15
# for Matt when he runs valgrind it is 53, but 64 when running regular R
16
16
# froll.c uses long double and appears to require full long double accuracy in the algo='exact'
test(6001.740, frollvar(c(1.5,2.5,2,NA), c(3,3)), list(c(NA,NA,0.25,NA), c(NA,NA,0.25,NA)), output="running sequentially, because outer parallelism has been used", options=c(datatable.verbose=TRUE)) # ensure no nested parallelism in rolling functions #7352
0 commit comments