Disproportionation tree badly formed?

[mliu49]

One of the head nodes in the disproporationation family is Y_rad_birad_trirad_quadrad, defined as a logic node, OR{Y_1centerquadrad, Y_1centertrirad, Y_2centerbirad, Y_1centerbirad, Y_rad, H_rad}.

Y_rad is defined as R u1, and H_rad is defined as H u1, so they are not mutually exclusive. This leads to any disprop reaction involving an H radical having twice the expected degeneracy.

I wanted to ask and confirm that this is not intentional, and that Y_rad should be changed to be R!H u1.

[nyee]

In the tree H_rad is L3 level with parent as Y_rad. I think its a mistake in the definition of Y_rad_birad_trirad_quadrad: it should not have H_rad. Could be a mistake from sloppy (probably my) tree-reordering.

Either way as a very small amount of optimization, I would recommend moving H_rad higher in the tree because it is probably the most commonly hit radical.

[mliu49]

Ah, good point. I didn't look at the tree. I'll make a PR.