Merge pull request #1501 from benjchristensen/blocking-next

blocking synchronous next

Author: benjchristensen

rxjava-core/src/main/java/rx/internal/operators/BlockingOperatorNext.java

@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 import java.util.NoSuchElementException;
 import java.util.concurrent.ArrayBlockingQueue;
 import java.util.concurrent.BlockingQueue;
+import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicBoolean;
 import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicIntegerFieldUpdater;
 
 import rx.Notification;
@@ -46,11 +47,7 @@ public static <T> Iterable<T> next(final Observable<? extends T> items) {
             @Override
             public Iterator<T> iterator() {
                 NextObserver<T> nextObserver = new NextObserver<T>();
-                final NextIterator<T> nextIterator = new NextIterator<T>(nextObserver);
-
-                items.materialize().subscribe(nextObserver);
-
-                return nextIterator;
+                return new NextIterator<T>(items, nextObserver);
             }
         };
 
@@ -59,28 +56,19 @@ public Iterator<T> iterator() {
     // test needs to access the observer.waiting flag non-blockingly.
     /* private */static final class NextIterator<T> implements Iterator<T> {
 
-        private final NextObserver<? extends T> observer;
+        private final NextObserver<T> observer;
+        private final Observable<? extends T> items;
         private T next;
         private boolean hasNext = true;
         private boolean isNextConsumed = true;
         private Throwable error = null;
+        private boolean started = false;
 
-        private NextIterator(NextObserver<? extends T> observer) {
+        private NextIterator(Observable<? extends T> items, NextObserver<T> observer) {
+            this.items = items;
             this.observer = observer;
         }
 
-        
-        // in tests, set the waiting flag without blocking for the next value to 
-        // allow lockstepping instead of multi-threading
-        /**
-         * In tests, set the waiting flag without blocking for the next value to 
-         * allow lockstepping instead of multi-threading
-         * @param value use 1 to enter into the waiting state
-         */
-        void setWaiting(int value) {
-            observer.setWaiting(value);
-        }
-        
         @Override
         public boolean hasNext() {
             if (error != null) {
@@ -102,6 +90,13 @@ public boolean hasNext() {
 
         private boolean moveToNext() {
             try {
+                if (!started) {
+                    started = true;
+                    // if not started, start now
+                    observer.setWaiting(1);
+                    items.materialize().subscribe(observer);
+                }
+                
                 Notification<? extends T> nextNotification = observer.takeNext();
                 if (nextNotification.isOnNext()) {
                     isNextConsumed = false;

rxjava-core/src/test/java/rx/internal/operators/BlockingOperatorNextTest.java

@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
 import rx.internal.operators.BlockingOperatorNext;
 import rx.observables.BlockingObservable;
 import rx.schedulers.Schedulers;
+import rx.subjects.BehaviorSubject;
 import rx.subjects.PublishSubject;
 import rx.subjects.Subject;
 
@@ -295,26 +296,27 @@ public void run() {
 
     @Test /* (timeout = 8000) */
     public void testSingleSourceManyIterators() throws InterruptedException {
-        PublishSubject<Long> ps = PublishSubject.create();
-        BlockingObservable<Long> source = ps.take(10).toBlocking();
+        Observable<Long> o = Observable.interval(10, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
+        PublishSubject<Void> terminal = PublishSubject.create();
+        BlockingObservable<Long> source = o.takeUntil(terminal).toBlocking();
 
         Iterable<Long> iter = source.next();
 
         for (int j = 0; j < 3; j++) {
             BlockingOperatorNext.NextIterator<Long> it = (BlockingOperatorNext.NextIterator<Long>)iter.iterator();
 
-            for (long i = 0; i < 9; i++) {
-                // hasNext has to set the waiting to true, otherwise, all onNext will be skipped
-                it.setWaiting(1);
-                ps.onNext(i);
+            for (long i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
                 Assert.assertEquals(true, it.hasNext());
-                Assert.assertEquals(j + "th iteration", Long.valueOf(i), it.next());
+                Assert.assertEquals(j + "th iteration next", Long.valueOf(i), it.next());
             }
-            it.setWaiting(1);
-            ps.onNext(9L);
-
-            Assert.assertEquals(j + "th iteration", false, it.hasNext());
+            terminal.onNext(null);
         }
-
+    }
+    
+    @Test
+    public void testSynchronousNext() {
+        assertEquals(1, BehaviorSubject.create(1).take(1).toBlocking().single().intValue());
+        assertEquals(2, BehaviorSubject.create(2).toBlocking().toIterable().iterator().next().intValue());
+        assertEquals(3, BehaviorSubject.create(3).toBlocking().next().iterator().next().intValue());
     }
 }