Unlink dead nodes in MpscLinkedQueue

Similar to
https://github.com/JCTools/JCTools/blob/master/jctools-core/src/main/java/org/jctools/queues/MpscLinkedQueue.java#L120,
null out the next pointer in the discarded consumer node
when polling from the queue. If not, we leave behind a (potentially long)
chain of connected garbage nodes. If we're unlucky (for example one of
the early nodes is promoted to old generation, triggering nepotism),
this can cause GC issues as now we have a long linked list which must be
marked by young collections.

Reproducer:

```
import io.reactivex.rxjava3.internal.queue.MpscLinkedQueue;

public class MpscLinkedQueueGC {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        MpscLinkedQueue<Integer> queue = new MpscLinkedQueue<>();
        for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) System.gc(); // tenure consumer node
        while (true) {
            queue.offer(123);
            queue.poll();
        }
    }
}
```

```
Before fix:

$ java -Xlog:gc -Xmx1G -cp build/classes/java/main MpscLinkedQueueGC.java
...
[1.261s] GC(20) Pause Young (Normal) (G1 Preventive Collection) 115M->115M(204M) 209.335ms
[1.385s] GC(23) Pause Young (Normal) (G1 Evacuation Pause) 148M->149M(204M) 31.491ms
[1.417s] GC(24) Pause Young (Normal) (G1 Evacuation Pause) 157M->158M(204M) 19.333ms
[1.453s] GC(25) Pause Young (Normal) (G1 Evacuation Pause) 166M->167M(599M) 22.678ms
[1.966s] GC(26) Pause Young (Normal) (G1 Evacuation Pause) 249M->249M(497M) 305.238ms
...

After fix:
$ java -Xlog:gc -Xmx1G -cp build/classes/java/main MpscLinkedQueueGC.java
...
[1.169s] GC(14) Pause Young (Normal) (G1 Evacuation Pause) 304M->2M(506M) 0.755ms
[1.558s] GC(15) Pause Young (Normal) (G1 Evacuation Pause) 304M->2M(506M) 0.689ms
[1.948s] GC(16) Pause Young (Normal) (G1 Evacuation Pause) 304M->2M(506M) 0.800ms
[2.337s] GC(17) Pause Young (Normal) (G1 Evacuation Pause) 304M->2M(506M) 0.714ms
...
```

Author: olivergillespie

src/main/java/io/reactivex/rxjava3/internal/queue/MpscLinkedQueue.java

@@ -91,6 +91,8 @@ public T poll() {
             // we have to null out the value because we are going to hang on to the node
             final T nextValue = nextNode.getAndNullValue();
             spConsumerNode(nextNode);
+            // unlink previous consumer to help gc
+            currConsumerNode.soNext(null);
             return nextValue;
         }
         else if (currConsumerNode != lvProducerNode()) {
@@ -101,6 +103,8 @@ else if (currConsumerNode != lvProducerNode()) {
             // we have to null out the value because we are going to hang on to the node
             final T nextValue = nextNode.getAndNullValue();
             spConsumerNode(nextNode);
+            // unlink previous consumer to help gc
+            currConsumerNode.soNext(null);
             return nextValue;
         }
         return null;