Org Chart - Not entirely self-explanatory to non-ReproNim Audience

[juliebates]

User testing comment - Org Chart needs simplification for general audience of all levels
Kate noticed several things:
-it looks like Dave sits at the head of the table, and then also sits at other tables and reports to himself
-CP/SP Projects aren't obvious as to what they are here, nor how they fit into ReproNim overall -- if we want to keep them in here, she suggests have that box be a clickable link to the CP/SP Collaboration page.
-What are the TRDs? There are a lot of questions here, why/how are people listed in several different places -- are these teams based on site? or are these teams based on project content, and if so, are these 'functional units' or workgroups - and if so, how would a site visitor who was interested in their work contact the group if that group's work was of particular(if the project was identified). In part this might point back to the type of project pages we had on the old site. Plus how do these TRD groups all report to the leadership gorup, which also seems to include some of them.

[asmacdo]

From meeting, lets add a little bit to the top-level "About" page and add links

[memartone]

Define TRD and CP/SP