|
| 1 | +name: New indicator source |
| 2 | +description: Provides details about a potential indicator data source |
| 3 | +title: "🐞: " |
| 4 | +labels: ["type: feature", "state: pending", "priority: 2day"] |
| 5 | +assignees: |
| 6 | + - Riduidel |
| 7 | +type: bug |
| 8 | +body: |
| 9 | +- type: input |
| 10 | + id: source_website |
| 11 | + attributes: |
| 12 | + label: What is the source website url? |
| 13 | + description: "Give the url of the indicator source website" |
| 14 | + placeholder: "https://linkedin.com, https://youtube.com" |
| 15 | + validations: |
| 16 | + required: true |
| 17 | +- type: checkboxes |
| 18 | + id: source_website_has_api |
| 19 | + attributes: |
| 20 | + label: Do the source website provides a way to get data ? |
| 21 | + options: |
| 22 | + - label: No (this implies scraping) |
| 23 | + - label: Yes, through HTTP REST API |
| 24 | + - label: Yes, through HTTP GraphQL API |
| 25 | + - label: Yes, through Google BigQuery dataset (this will be costly) |
| 26 | + - label: Yes, through a data dump (sqlite included) |
| 27 | + validations: |
| 28 | + required: true |
| 29 | +- type: textarea |
| 30 | + id: source_website_documentation |
| 31 | + attributes: |
| 32 | + label: Where is access to source website documented? |
| 33 | + description: "Give us all the good ways to access the source website data" |
| 34 | + value: | |
| 35 | + Website api access is documented in [] |
| 36 | +
|
| 37 | + The following websites provide examples to data access |
| 38 | + * |
| 39 | + * |
| 40 | +
|
| 41 | + There are examples using specifically Java code (or Java client API) in |
| 42 | + * |
| 43 | + * |
| 44 | +
|
| 45 | + validations: |
| 46 | + required: true |
| 47 | +- type: checkboxes |
| 48 | + id: supposed_indicators_mapping_ease |
| 49 | + attributes: |
| 50 | + label: Will it be easy to map indicators to technologies? |
| 51 | + description: You may select more than one. |
| 52 | + options: |
| 53 | + - label: Yes, website provides an api mapping to "known" technologies names |
| 54 | + - label: Yes, website uses repository urls |
| 55 | + - label: Quite, website uses a controlled naming analogous to our |
| 56 | + - label: No, website uses fuzzy naming which may be mapped to technologies |
| 57 | + validations: |
| 58 | + required: true |
| 59 | +- type: textarea |
| 60 | + id: supposed_indicators |
| 61 | + attributes: |
| 62 | + label: What indicators can we build using this website? |
| 63 | + description: "Name the indicators that we will be able to build" |
| 64 | + value: | |
| 65 | + * Number of confabulations |
| 66 | + * Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious number |
| 67 | + validations: |
| 68 | + required: true |
| 69 | +- type: textarea |
| 70 | + id: potential_priority |
| 71 | + attributes: |
| 72 | + label: Why is it important to add these indicators? |
| 73 | + description: "Is the website representative of developer usage?" |
| 74 | + value: | |
| 75 | + This website is important because it impacts a huge number of users ... |
| 76 | + This website is important because it provides very good sociological informations ... |
0 commit comments