|
| 1 | +// npx jest src/core/webview/__tests__/webviewMessageHandler.test.ts |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +import { webviewMessageHandler } from "../webviewMessageHandler" |
| 4 | +import { getModels } from "../../../api/providers/fetchers/modelCache" |
| 5 | + |
| 6 | +// Mock dependencies |
| 7 | +jest.mock("../../../api/providers/fetchers/modelCache", () => ({ |
| 8 | + getModels: jest.fn(), |
| 9 | + flushModels: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined), |
| 10 | +})) |
| 11 | + |
| 12 | +describe("webviewMessageHandler", () => { |
| 13 | + // Set up provider mock with essential methods needed by the handler |
| 14 | + const mockProvider = { |
| 15 | + postMessageToWebview: jest.fn(), |
| 16 | + getState: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue({ |
| 17 | + apiConfiguration: { |
| 18 | + openRouterApiKey: "mock-openrouter-key", |
| 19 | + requestyApiKey: "mock-requesty-key", |
| 20 | + glamaApiKey: "mock-glama-key", |
| 21 | + unboundApiKey: "mock-unbound-key", |
| 22 | + litellmApiKey: "mock-litellm-key", |
| 23 | + litellmBaseUrl: "https://mock-litellm-url", |
| 24 | + }, |
| 25 | + }), |
| 26 | + log: jest.fn(), |
| 27 | + } |
| 28 | + |
| 29 | + beforeEach(() => { |
| 30 | + jest.clearAllMocks() |
| 31 | + }) |
| 32 | + |
| 33 | + describe("requestRouterModels", () => { |
| 34 | + test("handles all successful model fetches correctly", async () => { |
| 35 | + // Mock all getModels calls to succeed with different data |
| 36 | + ;(getModels as jest.Mock).mockImplementation((router) => { |
| 37 | + return Promise.resolve({ |
| 38 | + [`${router}-model-1`]: { name: `${router} Model 1` }, |
| 39 | + [`${router}-model-2`]: { name: `${router} Model 2` }, |
| 40 | + }) |
| 41 | + }) |
| 42 | + |
| 43 | + // Call the handler |
| 44 | + await webviewMessageHandler(mockProvider as any, { |
| 45 | + type: "requestRouterModels", |
| 46 | + }) |
| 47 | + |
| 48 | + // Verify the provider posted the correct message with all models |
| 49 | + expect(mockProvider.postMessageToWebview).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ |
| 50 | + type: "routerModels", |
| 51 | + routerModels: { |
| 52 | + openrouter: { |
| 53 | + "openrouter-model-1": { name: "openrouter Model 1" }, |
| 54 | + "openrouter-model-2": { name: "openrouter Model 2" }, |
| 55 | + }, |
| 56 | + requesty: { |
| 57 | + "requesty-model-1": { name: "requesty Model 1" }, |
| 58 | + "requesty-model-2": { name: "requesty Model 2" }, |
| 59 | + }, |
| 60 | + glama: { |
| 61 | + "glama-model-1": { name: "glama Model 1" }, |
| 62 | + "glama-model-2": { name: "glama Model 2" }, |
| 63 | + }, |
| 64 | + unbound: { |
| 65 | + "unbound-model-1": { name: "unbound Model 1" }, |
| 66 | + "unbound-model-2": { name: "unbound Model 2" }, |
| 67 | + }, |
| 68 | + litellm: { |
| 69 | + "litellm-model-1": { name: "litellm Model 1" }, |
| 70 | + "litellm-model-2": { name: "litellm Model 2" }, |
| 71 | + }, |
| 72 | + }, |
| 73 | + }) |
| 74 | + }) |
| 75 | + |
| 76 | + test("handles some failed model fetches correctly", async () => { |
| 77 | + // Mock some getModels calls to succeed and others to fail |
| 78 | + ;(getModels as jest.Mock).mockImplementation((router) => { |
| 79 | + if (router === "openrouter" || router === "litellm") { |
| 80 | + return Promise.resolve({ |
| 81 | + [`${router}-model-1`]: { name: `${router} Model 1` }, |
| 82 | + }) |
| 83 | + } |
| 84 | + // For other routers, throw an error |
| 85 | + return Promise.reject(new Error(`Failed to fetch ${router} models`)) |
| 86 | + }) |
| 87 | + |
| 88 | + // Call the handler |
| 89 | + await webviewMessageHandler(mockProvider as any, { |
| 90 | + type: "requestRouterModels", |
| 91 | + }) |
| 92 | + |
| 93 | + // Verify the provider posted the correct message with only successful models |
| 94 | + expect(mockProvider.postMessageToWebview).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ |
| 95 | + type: "routerModels", |
| 96 | + routerModels: { |
| 97 | + openrouter: { |
| 98 | + "openrouter-model-1": { name: "openrouter Model 1" }, |
| 99 | + }, |
| 100 | + requesty: {}, |
| 101 | + glama: {}, |
| 102 | + unbound: {}, |
| 103 | + litellm: { |
| 104 | + "litellm-model-1": { name: "litellm Model 1" }, |
| 105 | + }, |
| 106 | + }, |
| 107 | + }) |
| 108 | + }) |
| 109 | + |
| 110 | + test("handles all failed model fetches correctly", async () => { |
| 111 | + // Mock all getModels calls to fail |
| 112 | + ;(getModels as jest.Mock).mockRejectedValue(new Error("API Error")) |
| 113 | + |
| 114 | + // Call the handler |
| 115 | + await webviewMessageHandler(mockProvider as any, { |
| 116 | + type: "requestRouterModels", |
| 117 | + }) |
| 118 | + |
| 119 | + // Verify the provider posted the correct message with empty objects for each router |
| 120 | + expect(mockProvider.postMessageToWebview).toHaveBeenCalledWith({ |
| 121 | + type: "routerModels", |
| 122 | + routerModels: { |
| 123 | + openrouter: {}, |
| 124 | + requesty: {}, |
| 125 | + glama: {}, |
| 126 | + unbound: {}, |
| 127 | + litellm: {}, |
| 128 | + }, |
| 129 | + }) |
| 130 | + }) |
| 131 | + }) |
| 132 | +}) |
0 commit comments