-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.6k
Fix reasoning budget for Gemini 2.5 Flash on OpenRouter #3945
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Changes from 1 commit
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| "roo-cline": patch | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| Fix reasoning budget for Gemini 2.5 Flash on OpenRouter |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -458,6 +458,8 @@ const ApiOptions = ({ | |||
| modelInfo={selectedModelInfo} | ||||
| /> | ||||
|
|
||||
| <pre>{JSON.stringify(selectedModelInfo, null, 2)}</pre> | ||||
|
||||
| <pre>{JSON.stringify(selectedModelInfo, null, 2)}</pre> |
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this intentional?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No 🙈
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I renamed this to make it clear that it's OpenRouter specific, so it's a bit weird that we're using it in LiteLLM.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah... I think the idea is to pull this from LiteLLM config instead soon, right @slytechnical?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Correct. The addition of support for that has been merged in on LiteLLM's side , but I figured we should wait till that goes live in their next release before switching to it on our end
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LiteLLM said that we didn’t need to wait for a release since it pulls from hosted config - probably worth confirming though.