fix: initialize enableReasoningEffort default value to fix save butto…

[wjq990112]

…n state

Related GitHub Issue

Closes: #7099

Roo Code Task Context (Optional)

Description

Since enableReasoningEffort is undefined initially, it will hit this condition:

https://github.com/wjq990112/Roo-Code/blob/main/webview-ui/src/components/settings/SettingsView.tsx#L232

isInitialSync will be true when the user clicks the checkbox for "Enable reasoning", so that the "Save" button will not change to enable.

Test Procedure

Pre-Submission Checklist

• Issue Linked: This PR is linked to an approved GitHub Issue (see "Related GitHub Issue" above).
• Scope: My changes are focused on the linked issue (one major feature/fix per PR).
• Self-Review: I have performed a thorough self-review of my code.
• Testing: New and/or updated tests have been added to cover my changes (if applicable).
• Documentation Impact: I have considered if my changes require documentation updates (see "Documentation Updates" section below).
• Contribution Guidelines: I have read and agree to the Contributor Guidelines.

Screenshots / Videos

Documentation Updates

Additional Notes

Get in Touch

---

Important

Initialize enableReasoningEffort to false in ThinkingBudget to fix save button state when checkbox is first checked.

• Behavior:
  • Initialize enableReasoningEffort to false in ThinkingBudget to fix save button state when checkbox is first checked.
  • Uses useEffect to set default value if enableReasoningEffort is undefined and isReasoningBudgetSupported is true.

^{This description was created by for 3cede8d8adfb06b5f2db80d1e3260340ac00e768. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.}

[roomote]

Thank you for your contribution! I've reviewed the changes and the fix correctly addresses the save button issue. The initialization of enableReasoningEffort to false prevents the isInitialSync logic from incorrectly treating user interactions as initialization. I have a couple of suggestions for improvement that you might want to consider.

[daniel-lxs]

Fixed by #7113