RFpeptides #387
Unanswered
wangzaimieyoutou
asked this question in
Q&A
RFpeptides
#387
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
When you say it doesn't form a cyclic structure, how are you checking? How far off of cyclic is it? Note that "cartoon" representations in structure viewers like PyMOL and ChimeraX tend not to do well with cyclic peptides, and may show a cartoon with a noticeable gap. Try turning off the cartoon representation, and use a "sticks" style representation (one which shows the actual atoms and bonds). It may be that your peptide closure geometry is fine, despite it looking broken when it initially loads. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I have been trying to follow the code examples in the README and also attempting to use design_macrocyclic_binder.sh for Macrocyclic peptide design with RFpeptides, but the output doesn't seem to form a cyclic structure as expected. Should I increase the number of designs generated to improve the probability of forming a cyclic structure?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions