Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
It seems like these questions are more related to Ligand/ProteinMPNN than RFdiffusion. You will likely get more support and comments by posting this issue in the LigandMPNN or ProteinMPNN repositories.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello authors,
I am working on a peptide-protein binding design project and am using a computational pipeline that involves RFdiffusion (for backbone generation) -> ProteinMPNN (for sequence design) -> AlphaFold2 (for structure prediction and validation).
I have two questions regarding the potential use of LigandMPNN to replace ProteinMPNN in this pipeline:
Replacing ProteinMPNN with LigandMPNN: Since my goal is to design a peptide that binds to a target protein, I understand that LigandMPNN is specifically designed for tasks with ligand context. Is replacing ProteinMPNN with LigandMPNN in this pipeline a recommended approach for generating high-quality protein-ligand sequences?
Error with
pack_side_chains
feature: I encountered an error when running LigandMPNN with thepack_side_chains
feature enabled. I noticed that this is an optional feature. Is it a mandatory feature for generating high-quality designs, or can I skip it and still get reliable sequences for subsequent experimental validation?Here is the error and the command I used:
Command:
**Traceback:**
Thank you for your time and assistance!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions