You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
we are split our rsync sources into many parts to start several rsync in parallel - I think many people do the same. However this may break hard-links. If hard-linked files happens to be in different transfer sets, they will be individual files on the receiving side.
Would it be possible to skip (and somehow record) files with link count >1, so we can handle theses separate, for example with an additional rsync run which can keep these files as hard-links.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hello
we are split our rsync sources into many parts to start several rsync in parallel - I think many people do the same. However this may break hard-links. If hard-linked files happens to be in different transfer sets, they will be individual files on the receiving side.
Would it be possible to skip (and somehow record) files with link count >1, so we can handle theses separate, for example with an additional rsync run which can keep these files as hard-links.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions