Skip to content

Commit 0217f39

Browse files
wtarreaugregkh
authored andcommitted
Documentation: security-bugs.rst: linux-distros relaxed their rules
The linux-distros list relaxed their rules to try to adapt better to how the Linux kernel works. Let's update the Coordination part to explain why and when to contact them or not to and how to avoid trouble in the future. Link: https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/09/08/4 Cc: Kees Cook <[email protected]> Cc: Solar Designer <[email protected]> Cc: Vegard Nossum <[email protected]> Acked-by: Jiri Kosina <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected] Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
1 parent 2e84dc3 commit 0217f39

File tree

1 file changed

+26
-9
lines changed

1 file changed

+26
-9
lines changed

Documentation/process/security-bugs.rst

Lines changed: 26 additions & 9 deletions
Original file line numberDiff line numberDiff line change
@@ -66,15 +66,32 @@ lifted, in perpetuity.
6666
Coordination with other groups
6767
------------------------------
6868

69-
The kernel security team strongly recommends that reporters of potential
70-
security issues NEVER contact the "linux-distros" mailing list until
71-
AFTER discussing it with the kernel security team. Do not Cc: both
72-
lists at once. You may contact the linux-distros mailing list after a
73-
fix has been agreed on and you fully understand the requirements that
74-
doing so will impose on you and the kernel community.
75-
76-
The different lists have different goals and the linux-distros rules do
77-
not contribute to actually fixing any potential security problems.
69+
While the kernel security team solely focuses on getting bugs fixed,
70+
other groups focus on fixing issues in distros and coordinating
71+
disclosure between operating system vendors. Coordination is usually
72+
handled by the "linux-distros" mailing list and disclosure by the
73+
public "oss-security" mailing list, both of which are closely related
74+
and presented in the linux-distros wiki:
75+
<https://oss-security.openwall.org/wiki/mailing-lists/distros>
76+
77+
Please note that the respective policies and rules are different since
78+
the 3 lists pursue different goals. Coordinating between the kernel
79+
security team and other teams is difficult since for the kernel security
80+
team occasional embargoes (as subject to a maximum allowed number of
81+
days) start from the availability of a fix, while for "linux-distros"
82+
they start from the initial post to the list regardless of the
83+
availability of a fix.
84+
85+
As such, the kernel security team strongly recommends that as a reporter
86+
of a potential security issue you DO NOT contact the "linux-distros"
87+
mailing list UNTIL a fix is accepted by the affected code's maintainers
88+
and you have read the distros wiki page above and you fully understand
89+
the requirements that contacting "linux-distros" will impose on you and
90+
the kernel community. This also means that in general it doesn't make
91+
sense to Cc: both lists at once, except maybe for coordination if and
92+
while an accepted fix has not yet been merged. In other words, until a
93+
fix is accepted do not Cc: "linux-distros", and after it's merged do not
94+
Cc: the kernel security team.
7895

7996
CVE assignment
8097
--------------

0 commit comments

Comments
 (0)