You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
pinmux_func_gpios[] contains a hole due to the missing function GPIO
definition for the "CTX0&CTX1" signal, which is the logical "AND" of the
first two CAN outputs.
A closer look reveals other issues:
- Some functionality is available on alternative pins, but the
PINMUX_DATA() entries is using the wrong marks,
- Several configurations are missing.
Fix this by:
- Renaming CTX0CTX1CTX2_MARK, CRX0CRX1_PJ22_MARK, and
CRX0CRX1CRX2_PJ20_MARK to CTX0_CTX1_CTX2_MARK, CRX0_CRX1_PJ22_MARK,
resp. CRX0_CRX1_CRX2_PJ20_MARK for consistency with the
corresponding enum IDs,
- Adding all missing enum IDs and marks,
- Use the right (*_PJ2x) variants for alternative pins,
- Adding all missing configurations to pinmux_data[],
- Adding all missing function GPIO definitions to pinmux_func_gpios[].
See SH7268 Group, SH7269 Group User’s Manual: Hardware, Rev. 2.00:
[1] Table 1.4 List of Pins
[2] Figure 23.29 Connection Example when Using Channels 0 and 1 as One
Channel (64 Mailboxes × 1 Channel) and Channel 2 as One Channel
(32 Mailboxes × 1 Channel),
[3] Figure 23.30 Connection Example when Using Channels 0, 1, and 2 as
One Channel (96 Mailboxes × 1 Channel),
[4] Table 48.3 Multiplexed Pins (Port B),
[5] Table 48.4 Multiplexed Pins (Port C),
[6] Table 48.10 Multiplexed Pins (Port J),
[7] Section 48.2.4 Port B Control Registers 0 to 5 (PBCR0 to PBCR5).
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
0 commit comments