You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Although harmless, the return statement in kvm_unexpected_el2_exception
is rather confusing as the function itself has a void return type. The
C standard is also pretty clear that "A return statement with an
expression shall not appear in a function whose return type is void".
Given that this return statement does not seem to add any actual value,
let's not pointlessly violate the standard.
Build-tested with GCC 10 and CLANG 13 for good measure, the disassembled
code is identical with or without the return statement.
Fixes: e9ee186 ("KVM: arm64: Add kvm_extable for vaxorcism code")
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
0 commit comments