You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There is a warning message in my test with below steps:
# rbd bench --io-type write --io-size 4K --io-threads 1 --io-pattern rand test &
# sleep 5
# pkill -9 rbd
# rbd map test &
# sleep 5
# pkill rbd
The reason is that the rbd_add_acquire_lock() is interruptable,
that means, when we kill the waiting on ->acquire_wait, the lock_dwork
could be still running.
1. do_rbd_add() 2. lock_dwork
rbd_add_acquire_lock()
- queue_delayed_work()
lock_dwork queued
- wait_for_completion_killable_timeout() <-- kill happen
rbd_dev_image_unlock() <-- UNLOCKED now, nothing to do.
rbd_dev_device_release()
rbd_dev_image_release()
- ...
lock successed here
- cancel_delayed_work_sync(&rbd_dev->lock_dwork)
Then when we reach the rbd_dev_free(), WARN_ON is triggered because
lock_state is not RBD_LOCK_STATE_UNLOCKED.
To fix it, this commit make sure the lock_dwork was finished before
calling rbd_dev_image_unlock().
On the other hand, this would not happend in do_rbd_remove(), because
after rbd mapped, lock_dwork will only be queued for IO request, and
request will continue unless lock_dwork finished. when we call
rbd_dev_image_unlock() in do_rbd_remove(), all requests are done.
That means, lock_state should not be locked again after
rbd_dev_image_unlock().
[ Cancel lock_dwork in rbd_add_acquire_lock(), only if the wait is
interrupted. ]
Fixes: 637cd06 ("rbd: new exclusive lock wait/wake code")
Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Ilya Dryomov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <[email protected]>
0 commit comments