You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
9p/net: xen: fix false positive printf format overflow warning
Use the constant to make the compiler happy about this warning:
net/9p/trans_xen.c: In function ‘xen_9pfs_front_changed’:
net/9p/trans_xen.c:444:39: warning: ‘%d’ directive writing between 1 and 11 bytes into a region of size 8 [-Wformat-overflow=]
444 | sprintf(str, "ring-ref%d", i);
| ^~
In function ‘xen_9pfs_front_init’,
inlined from ‘xen_9pfs_front_changed’ at net/9p/trans_xen.c:516:8,
inlined from ‘xen_9pfs_front_changed’ at net/9p/trans_xen.c:504:13:
net/9p/trans_xen.c:444:30: note: directive argument in the range [-2147483644, 2147483646]
444 | sprintf(str, "ring-ref%d", i);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~
net/9p/trans_xen.c:444:17: note: ‘sprintf’ output between 10 and 20 bytes into a destination of size 16
444 | sprintf(str, "ring-ref%d", i);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/9p/trans_xen.c: In function ‘xen_9pfs_front_changed’:
net/9p/trans_xen.c:450:45: warning: ‘%d’ directive writing between 1 and 11 bytes into a region of size 2 [-Wformat-overflow=]
450 | sprintf(str, "event-channel-%d", i);
| ^~
In function ‘xen_9pfs_front_init’,
inlined from ‘xen_9pfs_front_changed’ at net/9p/trans_xen.c:516:8,
inlined from ‘xen_9pfs_front_changed’ at net/9p/trans_xen.c:504:13:
net/9p/trans_xen.c:450:30: note: directive argument in the range [-2147483644, 2147483646]
450 | sprintf(str, "event-channel-%d", i);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/9p/trans_xen.c:450:17: note: ‘sprintf’ output between 16 and 26 bytes into a destination of size 16
450 | sprintf(str, "event-channel-%d", i);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There is no change in logic: there only are a constant number of rings,
and there also already is a BUILD_BUG_ON that checks if that constant
goes over 9 as anything bigger would no longer fit the event-channel-%d
destination size.
In theory having that size as part of the struct means it could be
modified by another thread and makes the compiler lose track of possible
values for 'i' here, using the constant directly here makes it work.
Signed-off-by: Dominique Martinet <[email protected]>
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Christian Schoenebeck <[email protected]>
0 commit comments