ACPI: PRM: Clean up guid type in struct prm_handler_info

Clang 19 prints a warning when we pass &th->guid to efi_pa_va_lookup():

drivers/acpi/prmt.c:156:29: error: passing 1-byte aligned argument to
4-byte aligned parameter 1 of 'efi_pa_va_lookup' may result in an
unaligned pointer access [-Werror,-Walign-mismatch]
  156 |                         (void *)efi_pa_va_lookup(&th->guid, handler_info->handler_address);
      |                                                  ^

The problem is that efi_pa_va_lookup() takes a efi_guid_t and &th->guid
is a regular guid_t.  The difference between the two types is the
alignment.  efi_guid_t is a typedef.

	typedef guid_t efi_guid_t __aligned(__alignof__(u32));

It's possible that this a bug in Clang 19.  Even though the alignment of
&th->guid is not explicitly specified, it will still end up being aligned
at 4 or 8 bytes.

Anyway, as Ard points out, it's cleaner to change guid to efi_guid_t type
and that also makes the warning go away.

Fixes: 088984c ("ACPI: PRM: Find EFI_MEMORY_RUNTIME block for PRM handler and context")
Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/[email protected]
[ rjw: Subject edit ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>

Author: Dan Carpenter

drivers/acpi/prmt.c

@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ struct prm_context_buffer {
 static LIST_HEAD(prm_module_list);
 
 struct prm_handler_info {
-	guid_t guid;
+	efi_guid_t guid;
 	efi_status_t (__efiapi *handler_addr)(u64, void *);
 	u64 static_data_buffer_addr;
 	u64 acpi_param_buffer_addr;