Rust-for-Linux
diff --git a/‎Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpufreq_drivers.rst
Lines changed: 274 additions & 0 deletions b/‎Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpufreq_drivers.rst
Lines changed: 274 additions & 0 deletions
diff --git a/‎Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpuidle.rst
Lines changed: 36 additions & 37 deletions b/‎Documentation/admin-guide/pm/cpuidle.rst
Lines changed: 36 additions & 37 deletions
diff --git a/‎Documentation/admin-guide/pm/intel_pstate.rst
Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions b/‎Documentation/admin-guide/pm/intel_pstate.rst
Lines changed: 2 additions & 2 deletions
diff --git a/‎Documentation/admin-guide/pm/working-state.rst
Lines changed: 1 addition & 0 deletions b/‎Documentation/admin-guide/pm/working-state.rst
Lines changed: 1 addition & 0 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,274 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+=======================================================
+Legacy Documentation of CPU Performance Scaling Drivers
+=======================================================
+
+Included below are historic documents describing assorted
+:doc:`CPU performance scaling <cpufreq>` drivers.  They are reproduced verbatim,
+with the original white space formatting and indentation preserved, except for
+the added leading space character in every line of text.
+
+
+AMD PowerNow! Drivers
+=====================
+
+::
+
+ PowerNow! and Cool'n'Quiet are AMD names for frequency
+ management capabilities in AMD processors. As the hardware
+ implementation changes in new generations of the processors,
+ there is a different cpu-freq driver for each generation.
+
+ Note that the driver's will not load on the "wrong" hardware,
+ so it is safe to try each driver in turn when in doubt as to
+ which is the correct driver.
+
+ Note that the functionality to change frequency (and voltage)
+ is not available in all processors. The drivers will refuse
+ to load on processors without this capability. The capability
+ is detected with the cpuid instruction.
+
+ The drivers use BIOS supplied tables to obtain frequency and
+ voltage information appropriate for a particular platform.
+ Frequency transitions will be unavailable if the BIOS does
+ not supply these tables.
+
+ 6th Generation: powernow-k6
+
+ 7th Generation: powernow-k7: Athlon, Duron, Geode.
+
+ 8th Generation: powernow-k8: Athlon, Athlon 64, Opteron, Sempron.
+ Documentation on this functionality in 8th generation processors
+ is available in the "BIOS and Kernel Developer's Guide", publication
+ 26094, in chapter 9, available for download from www.amd.com.
+
+ BIOS supplied data, for powernow-k7 and for powernow-k8, may be
+ from either the PSB table or from ACPI objects. The ACPI support
+ is only available if the kernel config sets CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR.
+ The powernow-k8 driver will attempt to use ACPI if so configured,
+ and fall back to PST if that fails.
+ The powernow-k7 driver will try to use the PSB support first, and
+ fall back to ACPI if the PSB support fails. A module parameter,
+ acpi_force, is provided to force ACPI support to be used instead
+ of PSB support.
+
+
+``cpufreq-nforce2``
+===================
+
+::
+
+ The cpufreq-nforce2 driver changes the FSB on nVidia nForce2 platforms.
+
+ This works better than on other platforms, because the FSB of the CPU
+ can be controlled independently from the PCI/AGP clock.
+
+ The module has two options:
+
+ 	fid: 	 multiplier * 10 (for example 8.5 = 85)
+ 	min_fsb: minimum FSB
+
+ If not set, fid is calculated from the current CPU speed and the FSB.
+ min_fsb defaults to FSB at boot time - 50 MHz.
+
+ IMPORTANT: The available range is limited downwards!
+            Also the minimum available FSB can differ, for systems
+            booting with 200 MHz, 150 should always work.
+
+
+``pcc-cpufreq``
+===============
+
+::
+
+ /*
+  *  pcc-cpufreq.txt - PCC interface documentation
+  *
+  *  Copyright (C) 2009 Red Hat, Matthew Garrett <[email protected]>
+  *  Copyright (C) 2009 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P.
+  *      Nagananda Chumbalkar <[email protected]>
+  */
+
+
+ 			Processor Clocking Control Driver
+ 			---------------------------------
+
+ Contents:
+ ---------
+ 1.	Introduction
+ 1.1	PCC interface
+ 1.1.1	Get Average Frequency
+ 1.1.2	Set Desired Frequency
+ 1.2	Platforms affected
+ 2.	Driver and /sys details
+ 2.1	scaling_available_frequencies
+ 2.2	cpuinfo_transition_latency
+ 2.3	cpuinfo_cur_freq
+ 2.4	related_cpus
+ 3.	Caveats
+
+ 1. Introduction:
+ ----------------
+ Processor Clocking Control (PCC) is an interface between the platform
+ firmware and OSPM. It is a mechanism for coordinating processor
+ performance (ie: frequency) between the platform firmware and the OS.
+
+ The PCC driver (pcc-cpufreq) allows OSPM to take advantage of the PCC
+ interface.
+
+ OS utilizes the PCC interface to inform platform firmware what frequency the
+ OS wants for a logical processor. The platform firmware attempts to achieve
+ the requested frequency. If the request for the target frequency could not be
+ satisfied by platform firmware, then it usually means that power budget
+ conditions are in place, and "power capping" is taking place.
+
+ 1.1 PCC interface:
+ ------------------
+ The complete PCC specification is available here:
+ https://acpica.org/sites/acpica/files/Processor-Clocking-Control-v1p0.pdf
+
+ PCC relies on a shared memory region that provides a channel for communication
+ between the OS and platform firmware. PCC also implements a "doorbell" that
+ is used by the OS to inform the platform firmware that a command has been
+ sent.
+
+ The ACPI PCCH() method is used to discover the location of the PCC shared
+ memory region. The shared memory region header contains the "command" and
+ "status" interface. PCCH() also contains details on how to access the platform
+ doorbell.
+
+ The following commands are supported by the PCC interface:
+ * Get Average Frequency
+ * Set Desired Frequency
+
+ The ACPI PCCP() method is implemented for each logical processor and is
+ used to discover the offsets for the input and output buffers in the shared
+ memory region.
+
+ When PCC mode is enabled, the platform will not expose processor performance
+ or throttle states (_PSS, _TSS and related ACPI objects) to OSPM. Therefore,
+ the native P-state driver (such as acpi-cpufreq for Intel, powernow-k8 for
+ AMD) will not load.
+
+ However, OSPM remains in control of policy. The governor (eg: "ondemand")
+ computes the required performance for each processor based on server workload.
+ The PCC driver fills in the command interface, and the input buffer and
+ communicates the request to the platform firmware. The platform firmware is
+ responsible for delivering the requested performance.
+
+ Each PCC command is "global" in scope and can affect all the logical CPUs in
+ the system. Therefore, PCC is capable of performing "group" updates. With PCC
+ the OS is capable of getting/setting the frequency of all the logical CPUs in
+ the system with a single call to the BIOS.
+
+ 1.1.1 Get Average Frequency:
+ ----------------------------
+ This command is used by the OSPM to query the running frequency of the
+ processor since the last time this command was completed. The output buffer
+ indicates the average unhalted frequency of the logical processor expressed as
+ a percentage of the nominal (ie: maximum) CPU frequency. The output buffer
+ also signifies if the CPU frequency is limited by a power budget condition.
+
+ 1.1.2 Set Desired Frequency:
+ ----------------------------
+ This command is used by the OSPM to communicate to the platform firmware the
+ desired frequency for a logical processor. The output buffer is currently
+ ignored by OSPM. The next invocation of "Get Average Frequency" will inform
+ OSPM if the desired frequency was achieved or not.
+
+ 1.2 Platforms affected:
+ -----------------------
+ The PCC driver will load on any system where the platform firmware:
+ * supports the PCC interface, and the associated PCCH() and PCCP() methods
+ * assumes responsibility for managing the hardware clocking controls in order
+ to deliver the requested processor performance
+
+ Currently, certain HP ProLiant platforms implement the PCC interface. On those
+ platforms PCC is the "default" choice.
+
+ However, it is possible to disable this interface via a BIOS setting. In
+ such an instance, as is also the case on platforms where the PCC interface
+ is not implemented, the PCC driver will fail to load silently.
+
+ 2. Driver and /sys details:
+ ---------------------------
+ When the driver loads, it merely prints the lowest and the highest CPU
+ frequencies supported by the platform firmware.
+
+ The PCC driver loads with a message such as:
+ pcc-cpufreq: (v1.00.00) driver loaded with frequency limits: 1600 MHz, 2933
+ MHz
+
+ This means that the OPSM can request the CPU to run at any frequency in
+ between the limits (1600 MHz, and 2933 MHz) specified in the message.
+
+ Internally, there is no need for the driver to convert the "target" frequency
+ to a corresponding P-state.
+
+ The VERSION number for the driver will be of the format v.xy.ab.
+ eg: 1.00.02
+    ----- --
+     |    |
+     |    -- this will increase with bug fixes/enhancements to the driver
+     |-- this is the version of the PCC specification the driver adheres to
+
+
+ The following is a brief discussion on some of the fields exported via the
+ /sys filesystem and how their values are affected by the PCC driver:
+
+ 2.1 scaling_available_frequencies:
+ ----------------------------------
+ scaling_available_frequencies is not created in /sys. No intermediate
+ frequencies need to be listed because the BIOS will try to achieve any
+ frequency, within limits, requested by the governor. A frequency does not have
+ to be strictly associated with a P-state.
+
+ 2.2 cpuinfo_transition_latency:
+ -------------------------------
+ The cpuinfo_transition_latency field is 0. The PCC specification does
+ not include a field to expose this value currently.
+
+ 2.3 cpuinfo_cur_freq:
+ ---------------------
+ A) Often cpuinfo_cur_freq will show a value different than what is declared
+ in the scaling_available_frequencies or scaling_cur_freq, or scaling_max_freq.
+ This is due to "turbo boost" available on recent Intel processors. If certain
+ conditions are met the BIOS can achieve a slightly higher speed than requested
+ by OSPM. An example:
+
+ scaling_cur_freq	: 2933000
+ cpuinfo_cur_freq	: 3196000
+
+ B) There is a round-off error associated with the cpuinfo_cur_freq value.
+ Since the driver obtains the current frequency as a "percentage" (%) of the
+ nominal frequency from the BIOS, sometimes, the values displayed by
+ scaling_cur_freq and cpuinfo_cur_freq may not match. An example:
+
+ scaling_cur_freq	: 1600000
+ cpuinfo_cur_freq	: 1583000
+
+ In this example, the nominal frequency is 2933 MHz. The driver obtains the
+ current frequency, cpuinfo_cur_freq, as 54% of the nominal frequency:
+
+ 	54% of 2933 MHz = 1583 MHz
+
+ Nominal frequency is the maximum frequency of the processor, and it usually
+ corresponds to the frequency of the P0 P-state.
+
+ 2.4 related_cpus:
+ -----------------
+ The related_cpus field is identical to affected_cpus.
+
+ affected_cpus	: 4
+ related_cpus	: 4
+
+ Currently, the PCC driver does not evaluate _PSD. The platforms that support
+ PCC do not implement SW_ALL. So OSPM doesn't need to perform any coordination
+ to ensure that the same frequency is requested of all dependent CPUs.
+
+ 3. Caveats:
+ -----------
+ The "cpufreq_stats" module in its present form cannot be loaded and
+ expected to work with the PCC driver. Since the "cpufreq_stats" module
+ provides information wrt each P-state, it is not applicable to the PCC driver.
@@ -583,20 +583,17 @@ Power Management Quality of Service for CPUs
 The power management quality of service (PM QoS) framework in the Linux kernel
 allows kernel code and user space processes to set constraints on various
 energy-efficiency features of the kernel to prevent performance from dropping
-below a required level.  The PM QoS constraints can be set globally, in
-predefined categories referred to as PM QoS classes, or against individual
-devices.
+below a required level.
 
 CPU idle time management can be affected by PM QoS in two ways, through the
-global constraint in the ``PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY`` class and through the
-resume latency constraints for individual CPUs.  Kernel code (e.g. device
-drivers) can set both of them with the help of special internal interfaces
-provided by the PM QoS framework.  User space can modify the former by opening
-the :file:`cpu_dma_latency` special device file under :file:`/dev/` and writing
-a binary value (interpreted as a signed 32-bit integer) to it.  In turn, the
-resume latency constraint for a CPU can be modified by user space by writing a
-string (representing a signed 32-bit integer) to the
-:file:`power/pm_qos_resume_latency_us` file under
+global CPU latency limit and through the resume latency constraints for
+individual CPUs.  Kernel code (e.g. device drivers) can set both of them with
+the help of special internal interfaces provided by the PM QoS framework.  User
+space can modify the former by opening the :file:`cpu_dma_latency` special
+device file under :file:`/dev/` and writing a binary value (interpreted as a
+signed 32-bit integer) to it.  In turn, the resume latency constraint for a CPU
+can be modified from user space by writing a string (representing a signed
+32-bit integer) to the :file:`power/pm_qos_resume_latency_us` file under
 :file:`/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu<N>/` in ``sysfs``, where the CPU number
 ``<N>`` is allocated at the system initialization time.  Negative values
 will be rejected in both cases and, also in both cases, the written integer
@@ -605,32 +602,34 @@ number will be interpreted as a requested PM QoS constraint in microseconds.
 The requested value is not automatically applied as a new constraint, however,
 as it may be less restrictive (greater in this particular case) than another
 constraint previously requested by someone else.  For this reason, the PM QoS
-framework maintains a list of requests that have been made so far in each
-global class and for each device, aggregates them and applies the effective
-(minimum in this particular case) value as the new constraint.
+framework maintains a list of requests that have been made so far for the
+global CPU latency limit and for each individual CPU, aggregates them and
+applies the effective (minimum in this particular case) value as the new
+constraint.
 
 In fact, opening the :file:`cpu_dma_latency` special device file causes a new
-PM QoS request to be created and added to the priority list of requests in the
-``PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY`` class and the file descriptor coming from the
-"open" operation represents that request.  If that file descriptor is then
-used for writing, the number written to it will be associated with the PM QoS
-request represented by it as a new requested constraint value.  Next, the
-priority list mechanism will be used to determine the new effective value of
-the entire list of requests and that effective value will be set as a new
-constraint.  Thus setting a new requested constraint value will only change the
-real constraint if the effective "list" value is affected by it.  In particular,
-for the ``PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY`` class it only affects the real constraint if
-it is the minimum of the requested constraints in the list.  The process holding
-a file descriptor obtained by opening the :file:`cpu_dma_latency` special device
-file controls the PM QoS request associated with that file descriptor, but it
-controls this particular PM QoS request only.
+PM QoS request to be created and added to a global priority list of CPU latency
+limit requests and the file descriptor coming from the "open" operation
+represents that request.  If that file descriptor is then used for writing, the
+number written to it will be associated with the PM QoS request represented by
+it as a new requested limit value.  Next, the priority list mechanism will be
+used to determine the new effective value of the entire list of requests and
+that effective value will be set as a new CPU latency limit.  Thus requesting a
+new limit value will only change the real limit if the effective "list" value is
+affected by it, which is the case if it is the minimum of the requested values
+in the list.
+
+The process holding a file descriptor obtained by opening the
+:file:`cpu_dma_latency` special device file controls the PM QoS request
+associated with that file descriptor, but it controls this particular PM QoS
+request only.
 
 Closing the :file:`cpu_dma_latency` special device file or, more precisely, the
 file descriptor obtained while opening it, causes the PM QoS request associated
-with that file descriptor to be removed from the ``PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY``
-class priority list and destroyed.  If that happens, the priority list mechanism
-will be used, again, to determine the new effective value for the whole list
-and that value will become the new real constraint.
+with that file descriptor to be removed from the global priority list of CPU
+latency limit requests and destroyed.  If that happens, the priority list
+mechanism will be used again, to determine the new effective value for the whole
+list and that value will become the new limit.
 
 In turn, for each CPU there is one resume latency PM QoS request associated with
 the :file:`power/pm_qos_resume_latency_us` file under
@@ -647,10 +646,10 @@ CPU in question every time the list of requests is updated this way or another
 (there may be other requests coming from kernel code in that list).
 
 CPU idle time governors are expected to regard the minimum of the global
-effective ``PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY`` class constraint and the effective
-resume latency constraint for the given CPU as the upper limit for the exit
-latency of the idle states they can select for that CPU.  They should never
-select any idle states with exit latency beyond that limit.
+(effective) CPU latency limit and the effective resume latency constraint for
+the given CPU as the upper limit for the exit latency of the idle states that
+they are allowed to select for that CPU.  They should never select any idle
+states with exit latency beyond that limit.
 
 
 Idle States Control Via Kernel Command Line
 
@@ -734,10 +734,10 @@ References
 ==========
 
 .. [1] Kristen Accardi, *Balancing Power and Performance in the Linux Kernel*,
-       http://events.linuxfoundation.org/sites/events/files/slides/LinuxConEurope_2015.pdf
+       https://events.static.linuxfound.org/sites/events/files/slides/LinuxConEurope_2015.pdf
 
 .. [2] *Intel® 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer’s Manual Volume 3: System Programming Guide*,
-       http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/architecture-and-technology/64-ia-32-architectures-software-developer-system-programming-manual-325384.html
+       https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/architecture-and-technology/64-ia-32-architectures-software-developer-system-programming-manual-325384.html
 
 .. [3] *Advanced Configuration and Power Interface Specification*,
        https://uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/ACPI_6_3_final_Jan30.pdf
@@ -11,4 +11,5 @@ Working-State Power Management
    intel_idle
    cpufreq
    intel_pstate
+   cpufreq_drivers
    intel_epb