You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
vfs: partially sanitize i_state zeroing on inode creation
new_inode used to have the following:
spin_lock(&inode_lock);
inodes_stat.nr_inodes++;
list_add(&inode->i_list, &inode_in_use);
list_add(&inode->i_sb_list, &sb->s_inodes);
inode->i_ino = ++last_ino;
inode->i_state = 0;
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
over time things disappeared, got moved around or got replaced (global
inode lock with a per-inode lock), eventually this got reduced to:
spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
inode->i_state = 0;
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
But the lock acquire here does not synchronize against anyone.
Additionally iget5_locked performs i_state = 0 assignment without any
locks to begin with, the two combined look confusing at best.
It looks like the current state is a leftover which was not cleaned up.
Ideally it would be an invariant that i_state == 0 to begin with, but
achieving that would require dealing with all filesystem alloc handlers
one by one.
In the meantime drop the misleading locking and move i_state zeroing to
inode_init_always so that others don't need to deal with it by hand.
Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <[email protected]>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <[email protected]>
0 commit comments