io_uring: fix false positive sqo warning on flush

WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 9094 at fs/io_uring.c:8884
	io_disable_sqo_submit+0x106/0x130 fs/io_uring.c:8884
Call Trace:
 io_uring_flush+0x28b/0x3a0 fs/io_uring.c:9099
 filp_close+0xb4/0x170 fs/open.c:1280
 close_fd+0x5c/0x80 fs/file.c:626
 __do_sys_close fs/open.c:1299 [inline]
 __se_sys_close fs/open.c:1297 [inline]
 __x64_sys_close+0x2f/0xa0 fs/open.c:1297
 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

io_uring's final close() may be triggered by any task not only the
creator. It's well handled by io_uring_flush() including SQPOLL case,
though a warning in io_disable_sqo_submit() will fallaciously fire by
moving this warning out to the only call site that matters.

Reported-by: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>

Author: isilence

fs/io_uring.c

@@ -8918,8 +8918,6 @@ static void __io_uring_cancel_task_requests(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
 
 static void io_disable_sqo_submit(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
 {
-	WARN_ON_ONCE(ctx->sqo_task != current);
-
 	mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
 	ctx->sqo_dead = 1;
 	mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
@@ -8941,6 +8939,7 @@ static void io_uring_cancel_task_requests(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
 
 	if ((ctx->flags & IORING_SETUP_SQPOLL) && ctx->sq_data) {
 		/* for SQPOLL only sqo_task has task notes */
+		WARN_ON_ONCE(ctx->sqo_task != current);
 		io_disable_sqo_submit(ctx);
 		task = ctx->sq_data->thread;
 		atomic_inc(&task->io_uring->in_idle);