mmc: Merge branch fixes into next

Merge the mmc fixes for v6.8-rc[n] into the next branch, to allow them to
get tested together with the new mmc changes that are targeted for v6.9.

Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <[email protected]>

Author: storulf

drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-xenon-phy.c

@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 #include <linux/slab.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
 #include <linux/ktime.h>
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
 #include <linux/of_address.h>
 
 #include "sdhci-pltfm.h"
@@ -109,6 +110,8 @@
 #define XENON_EMMC_PHY_LOGIC_TIMING_ADJUST	(XENON_EMMC_PHY_REG_BASE + 0x18)
 #define XENON_LOGIC_TIMING_VALUE		0x00AA8977
 
+#define XENON_MAX_PHY_TIMEOUT_LOOPS		100
+
 /*
  * List offset of PHY registers and some special register values
  * in eMMC PHY 5.0 or eMMC PHY 5.1
@@ -216,6 +219,19 @@ static int xenon_alloc_emmc_phy(struct sdhci_host *host)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int xenon_check_stability_internal_clk(struct sdhci_host *host)
+{
+	u32 reg;
+	int err;
+
+	err = read_poll_timeout(sdhci_readw, reg, reg & SDHCI_CLOCK_INT_STABLE,
+				1100, 20000, false, host, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
+	if (err)
+		dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "phy_init: Internal clock never stabilized.\n");
+
+	return err;
+}
+
 /*
  * eMMC 5.0/5.1 PHY init/re-init.
  * eMMC PHY init should be executed after:
@@ -232,6 +248,11 @@ static int xenon_emmc_phy_init(struct sdhci_host *host)
 	struct xenon_priv *priv = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
 	struct xenon_emmc_phy_regs *phy_regs = priv->emmc_phy_regs;
 
+	int ret = xenon_check_stability_internal_clk(host);
+
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
 	reg = sdhci_readl(host, phy_regs->timing_adj);
 	reg |= XENON_PHY_INITIALIZAION;
 	sdhci_writel(host, reg, phy_regs->timing_adj);
@@ -259,18 +280,27 @@ static int xenon_emmc_phy_init(struct sdhci_host *host)
 	/* get the wait time */
 	wait /= clock;
 	wait++;
-	/* wait for host eMMC PHY init completes */
-	udelay(wait);
 
-	reg = sdhci_readl(host, phy_regs->timing_adj);
-	reg &= XENON_PHY_INITIALIZAION;
-	if (reg) {
+	/*
+	 * AC5X spec says bit must be polled until zero.
+	 * We see cases in which timeout can take longer
+	 * than the standard calculation on AC5X, which is
+	 * expected following the spec comment above.
+	 * According to the spec, we must wait as long as
+	 * it takes for that bit to toggle on AC5X.
+	 * Cap that with 100 delay loops so we won't get
+	 * stuck here forever:
+	 */
+
+	ret = read_poll_timeout(sdhci_readl, reg,
+				!(reg & XENON_PHY_INITIALIZAION),
+				wait, XENON_MAX_PHY_TIMEOUT_LOOPS * wait,
+				false, host, phy_regs->timing_adj);
+	if (ret)
 		dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "eMMC PHY init cannot complete after %d us\n",
-			wait);
-		return -ETIMEDOUT;
-	}
+			wait * XENON_MAX_PHY_TIMEOUT_LOOPS);
 
-	return 0;
+	return ret;
 }
 
 #define ARMADA_3700_SOC_PAD_1_8V	0x1