jfs: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member

The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] KSPP#21
[3] commit 7649773 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <[email protected]>

Author: GustavoARSilva

fs/jfs/jfs_dtree.c

@@ -2964,7 +2964,7 @@ struct jfs_dirent {
 	loff_t position;
 	int ino;
 	u16 name_len;
-	char name[0];
+	char name[];
 };
 
 /*

fs/jfs/jfs_xattr.h

@@ -17,12 +17,12 @@ struct jfs_ea {
 	u8 flag;	/* Unused? */
 	u8 namelen;	/* Length of name */
 	__le16 valuelen;	/* Length of value */
-	char name[0];	/* Attribute name (includes null-terminator) */
+	char name[];	/* Attribute name (includes null-terminator) */
 };			/* Value immediately follows name */
 
 struct jfs_ea_list {
 	__le32 size;		/* overall size */
-	struct jfs_ea ea[0];	/* Variable length list */
+	struct jfs_ea ea[];	/* Variable length list */
 };
 
 /* Macros for defining maxiumum number of bytes supported for EAs */