x86/fpu/xstate: Fix small issues

In response to earlier comments, fix small issues before introducing
XSAVES supervisor states:

- Fix comments of xfeature_is_supervisor().
- Replace ((u64)1 << 63) with XCOMP_BV_COMPACTED_FORMAT.

No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <[email protected]>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <[email protected]>
Cc: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <[email protected]>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Cc: "Ravi V. Shankar" <[email protected]>
Cc: Rik van Riel <[email protected]>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Cc: x86-ml <[email protected]>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]

Author: yyu-intel-com

arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c

@@ -110,12 +110,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_has_xfeatures);
 static int xfeature_is_supervisor(int xfeature_nr)
 {
 	/*
-	 * We currently do not support supervisor states, but if
-	 * we did, we could find out like this.
-	 *
-	 * SDM says: If state component 'i' is a user state component,
-	 * ECX[0] return 0; if state component i is a supervisor
-	 * state component, ECX[0] returns 1.
+	 * Extended State Enumeration Sub-leaves (EAX = 0DH, ECX = n, n > 1)
+	 * returns ECX[0] set to (1) for a supervisor state, and cleared (0)
+	 * for a user state.
 	 */
 	u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
 
@@ -419,7 +416,8 @@ static void __init setup_init_fpu_buf(void)
 	print_xstate_features();
 
 	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_XSAVES))
-		init_fpstate.xsave.header.xcomp_bv = (u64)1 << 63 | xfeatures_mask;
+		init_fpstate.xsave.header.xcomp_bv = XCOMP_BV_COMPACTED_FORMAT |
+						     xfeatures_mask;
 
 	/*
 	 * Init all the features state with header.xfeatures being 0x0