You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
G920 device only advertises REPORT_ID_HIDPP_LONG and
REPORT_ID_HIDPP_VERY_LONG in its HID report descriptor, so querying
for REPORT_ID_HIDPP_SHORT with optional=false will always fail and
prevent G920 to be recognized as a valid HID++ device.
To fix this and improve some other aspects, modify
hidpp_validate_device() as follows:
- Inline the code of hidpp_validate_report() to simplify
distingushing between non-present and invalid report descriptors
- Drop the check for id >= HID_MAX_IDS || id < 0 since all of our
IDs are static and known to satisfy that at compile time
- Change the algorithms to check all possible report
types (including very long report) and deem the device as a valid
HID++ device if it supports at least one
- Treat invalid report length as a hard stop for the validation
algorithm, meaning that if any of the supported reports has
invalid length we assume the worst and treat the device as a
generic HID device.
- Fold initialization of hidpp->very_long_report_length into
hidpp_validate_device() since it already fetches very long report
length and validates its value
Fixes: fe3ee1e ("HID: logitech-hidpp: allow non HID++ devices to be handled by this module")
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204191
Reported-by: Sam Bazely <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <[email protected]>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <[email protected]>
Cc: Benjamin Tissoires <[email protected]>
Cc: Henrik Rydberg <[email protected]>
Cc: Pierre-Loup A. Griffais <[email protected]>
Cc: Austin Palmer <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected] # 5.2+
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <[email protected]>
0 commit comments