You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There has been some heat around prandom_u32() lately, and some people
were wondering if there was a simple way to determine how often
it was used, before considering making it maybe 10 times more expensive.
This tracepoint exports the generated pseudo random value.
Tested:
perf list | grep prandom_u32
random:prandom_u32 [Tracepoint event]
perf record -a [-g] [-C1] -e random:prandom_u32 sleep 1
[ perf record: Woken up 0 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 259.748 MB perf.data (924087 samples) ]
perf report --nochildren
...
97.67% ksoftirqd/1 [kernel.vmlinux] [k] prandom_u32
|
---prandom_u32
prandom_u32
|
|--48.86%--tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock
| tcp_check_req
| tcp_v4_rcv
| ...
--48.81%--tcp_conn_request
tcp_v4_conn_request
tcp_rcv_state_process
...
perf script
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <[email protected]>
Cc: Sedat Dilek <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
0 commit comments