Merge series "MAINTAINER entries for few ROHM power devices" from Matti Vaittinen <[email protected]>:

Add maintainer entries to a few ROHM devices and Linear Ranges

Linear Ranges helpers were refactored out of regulator core to lib so
that other drivers could utilize them too. (I guess power/supply drivers
and possibly clk drivers can benefit from them). As regulators is
currently the main user it makes sense the changes to linear_ranges go
through Mark's tree.

During past two years few ROHM PMIC drivers have been added to
mainstream. They deserve a supporter from ROHM side too :)

Patch 1:
	Maintainer entries for few ROHM IC drivers
Patch 2:
	Maintainer entry for linear ranges helpers

---

Matti Vaittinen (2):
  MAINTAINERS: Add entry for ROHM power management ICs
  MAINTAINERS: Add maintainer entry for linear ranges helper

 MAINTAINERS | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)

base-commit: b9bbe6e
--
2.21.0

--
Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers
ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC
Kiviharjunlenkki 1E
90220 OULU
FINLAND

~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then he vanished ~~~
Simon says - in Latin please.
~~~ "non cogito me" dixit Rene Descarte, deinde evanescavit ~~~
Thanks to Simon Glass for the translation =]

Author: broonie

Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst

@@ -112,6 +112,20 @@ used when printing stack backtraces. The specifier takes into
 consideration the effect of compiler optimisations which may occur
 when tail-calls are used and marked with the noreturn GCC attribute.
 
+Probed Pointers from BPF / tracing
+----------------------------------
+
+::
+
+	%pks	kernel string
+	%pus	user string
+
+The ``k`` and ``u`` specifiers are used for printing prior probed memory from
+either kernel memory (k) or user memory (u). The subsequent ``s`` specifier
+results in printing a string. For direct use in regular vsnprintf() the (k)
+and (u) annotation is ignored, however, when used out of BPF's bpf_trace_printk(),
+for example, it reads the memory it is pointing to without faulting.
+
 Kernel Pointers
 ---------------
 

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/dma/fsl-edma.txt

@@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ Required properties:
 - compatible :
 	- "fsl,vf610-edma" for eDMA used similar to that on Vybrid vf610 SoC
 	- "fsl,imx7ulp-edma" for eDMA2 used similar to that on i.mx7ulp
-	- "fsl,fsl,ls1028a-edma" for eDMA used similar to that on Vybrid vf610 SoC
+	- "fsl,ls1028a-edma" followed by "fsl,vf610-edma" for eDMA used on the
+	  LS1028A SoC.
 - reg : Specifies base physical address(s) and size of the eDMA registers.
 	The 1st region is eDMA control register's address and size.
 	The 2nd and the 3rd regions are programmable channel multiplexing

Documentation/networking/devlink/ice.rst

@@ -61,8 +61,8 @@ The ``ice`` driver reports the following versions
       - running
       - ICE OS Default Package
       - The name of the DDP package that is active in the device. The DDP
-        package is loaded by the driver during initialization. Each varation
-        of DDP package shall have a unique name.
+        package is loaded by the driver during initialization. Each
+        variation of the DDP package has a unique name.
     * - ``fw.app``
       - running
       - 1.3.1.0

Documentation/usb/raw-gadget.rst

@@ -27,9 +27,8 @@ differences are:
 3. Raw Gadget provides a way to select a UDC device/driver to bind to,
    while GadgetFS currently binds to the first available UDC.
 
-4. Raw Gadget uses predictable endpoint names (handles) across different
-   UDCs (as long as UDCs have enough endpoints of each required transfer
-   type).
+4. Raw Gadget explicitly exposes information about endpoints addresses and
+   capabilities allowing a user to write UDC-agnostic gadgets.
 
 5. Raw Gadget has ioctl-based interface instead of a filesystem-based one.
 
@@ -50,12 +49,36 @@ The typical usage of Raw Gadget looks like:
    Raw Gadget and react to those depending on what kind of USB device
    needs to be emulated.
 
+Note, that some UDC drivers have fixed addresses assigned to endpoints, and
+therefore arbitrary endpoint addresses can't be used in the descriptors.
+Nevertheles, Raw Gadget provides a UDC-agnostic way to write USB gadgets.
+Once a USB_RAW_EVENT_CONNECT event is received via USB_RAW_IOCTL_EVENT_FETCH,
+the USB_RAW_IOCTL_EPS_INFO ioctl can be used to find out information about
+endpoints that the UDC driver has. Based on that information, the user must
+chose UDC endpoints that will be used for the gadget being emulated, and
+properly assign addresses in endpoint descriptors.
+
+You can find usage examples (along with a test suite) here:
+
+https://github.com/xairy/raw-gadget
+
+Internal details
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Currently every endpoint read/write ioctl submits a USB request and waits until
+its completion. This is the desired mode for coverage-guided fuzzing (as we'd
+like all USB request processing happen during the lifetime of a syscall),
+and must be kept in the implementation. (This might be slow for real world
+applications, thus the O_NONBLOCK improvement suggestion below.)
+
 Potential future improvements
 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
-- Implement ioctl's for setting/clearing halt status on endpoints.
-
-- Reporting more events (suspend, resume, etc.) through
-  USB_RAW_IOCTL_EVENT_FETCH.
+- Report more events (suspend, resume, etc.) through USB_RAW_IOCTL_EVENT_FETCH.
 
 - Support O_NONBLOCK I/O.
+
+- Support USB 3 features (accept SS endpoint companion descriptor when
+  enabling endpoints; allow providing stream_id for bulk transfers).
+
+- Support ISO transfer features (expose frame_number for completed requests).

Documentation/virt/kvm/index.rst

@@ -28,3 +28,5 @@ KVM
    arm/index
 
    devices/index
+
+   running-nested-guests

Documentation/virt/kvm/running-nested-guests.rst

@@ -0,0 +1,276 @@
+==============================
+Running nested guests with KVM
+==============================
+
+A nested guest is the ability to run a guest inside another guest (it
+can be KVM-based or a different hypervisor).  The straightforward
+example is a KVM guest that in turn runs on a KVM guest (the rest of
+this document is built on this example)::
+
+              .----------------.  .----------------.
+              |                |  |                |
+              |      L2        |  |      L2        |
+              | (Nested Guest) |  | (Nested Guest) |
+              |                |  |                |
+              |----------------'--'----------------|
+              |                                    |
+              |       L1 (Guest Hypervisor)        |
+              |          KVM (/dev/kvm)            |
+              |                                    |
+      .------------------------------------------------------.
+      |                 L0 (Host Hypervisor)                 |
+      |                    KVM (/dev/kvm)                    |
+      |------------------------------------------------------|
+      |        Hardware (with virtualization extensions)     |
+      '------------------------------------------------------'
+
+Terminology:
+
+- L0 – level-0; the bare metal host, running KVM
+
+- L1 – level-1 guest; a VM running on L0; also called the "guest
+  hypervisor", as it itself is capable of running KVM.
+
+- L2 – level-2 guest; a VM running on L1, this is the "nested guest"
+
+.. note:: The above diagram is modelled after the x86 architecture;
+          s390x, ppc64 and other architectures are likely to have
+          a different design for nesting.
+
+          For example, s390x always has an LPAR (LogicalPARtition)
+          hypervisor running on bare metal, adding another layer and
+          resulting in at least four levels in a nested setup — L0 (bare
+          metal, running the LPAR hypervisor), L1 (host hypervisor), L2
+          (guest hypervisor), L3 (nested guest).
+
+          This document will stick with the three-level terminology (L0,
+          L1, and L2) for all architectures; and will largely focus on
+          x86.
+
+
+Use Cases
+---------
+
+There are several scenarios where nested KVM can be useful, to name a
+few:
+
+- As a developer, you want to test your software on different operating
+  systems (OSes).  Instead of renting multiple VMs from a Cloud
+  Provider, using nested KVM lets you rent a large enough "guest
+  hypervisor" (level-1 guest).  This in turn allows you to create
+  multiple nested guests (level-2 guests), running different OSes, on
+  which you can develop and test your software.
+
+- Live migration of "guest hypervisors" and their nested guests, for
+  load balancing, disaster recovery, etc.
+
+- VM image creation tools (e.g. ``virt-install``,  etc) often run
+  their own VM, and users expect these to work inside a VM.
+
+- Some OSes use virtualization internally for security (e.g. to let
+  applications run safely in isolation).
+
+
+Enabling "nested" (x86)
+-----------------------
+
+From Linux kernel v4.19 onwards, the ``nested`` KVM parameter is enabled
+by default for Intel and AMD.  (Though your Linux distribution might
+override this default.)
+
+In case you are running a Linux kernel older than v4.19, to enable
+nesting, set the ``nested`` KVM module parameter to ``Y`` or ``1``.  To
+persist this setting across reboots, you can add it in a config file, as
+shown below:
+
+1. On the bare metal host (L0), list the kernel modules and ensure that
+   the KVM modules::
+
+    $ lsmod | grep -i kvm
+    kvm_intel             133627  0
+    kvm                   435079  1 kvm_intel
+
+2. Show information for ``kvm_intel`` module::
+
+    $ modinfo kvm_intel | grep -i nested
+    parm:           nested:bool
+
+3. For the nested KVM configuration to persist across reboots, place the
+   below in ``/etc/modprobed/kvm_intel.conf`` (create the file if it
+   doesn't exist)::
+
+    $ cat /etc/modprobe.d/kvm_intel.conf
+    options kvm-intel nested=y
+
+4. Unload and re-load the KVM Intel module::
+
+    $ sudo rmmod kvm-intel
+    $ sudo modprobe kvm-intel
+
+5. Verify if the ``nested`` parameter for KVM is enabled::
+
+    $ cat /sys/module/kvm_intel/parameters/nested
+    Y
+
+For AMD hosts, the process is the same as above, except that the module
+name is ``kvm-amd``.
+
+
+Additional nested-related kernel parameters (x86)
+-------------------------------------------------
+
+If your hardware is sufficiently advanced (Intel Haswell processor or
+higher, which has newer hardware virt extensions), the following
+additional features will also be enabled by default: "Shadow VMCS
+(Virtual Machine Control Structure)", APIC Virtualization on your bare
+metal host (L0).  Parameters for Intel hosts::
+
+    $ cat /sys/module/kvm_intel/parameters/enable_shadow_vmcs
+    Y
+
+    $ cat /sys/module/kvm_intel/parameters/enable_apicv
+    Y
+
+    $ cat /sys/module/kvm_intel/parameters/ept
+    Y
+
+.. note:: If you suspect your L2 (i.e. nested guest) is running slower,
+          ensure the above are enabled (particularly
+          ``enable_shadow_vmcs`` and ``ept``).
+
+
+Starting a nested guest (x86)
+-----------------------------
+
+Once your bare metal host (L0) is configured for nesting, you should be
+able to start an L1 guest with::
+
+    $ qemu-kvm -cpu host [...]
+
+The above will pass through the host CPU's capabilities as-is to the
+gues); or for better live migration compatibility, use a named CPU
+model supported by QEMU. e.g.::
+
+    $ qemu-kvm -cpu Haswell-noTSX-IBRS,vmx=on
+
+then the guest hypervisor will subsequently be capable of running a
+nested guest with accelerated KVM.
+
+
+Enabling "nested" (s390x)
+-------------------------
+
+1. On the host hypervisor (L0), enable the ``nested`` parameter on
+   s390x::
+
+    $ rmmod kvm
+    $ modprobe kvm nested=1
+
+.. note:: On s390x, the kernel parameter ``hpage`` is mutually exclusive
+          with the ``nested`` paramter — i.e. to be able to enable
+          ``nested``, the ``hpage`` parameter *must* be disabled.
+
+2. The guest hypervisor (L1) must be provided with the ``sie`` CPU
+   feature — with QEMU, this can be done by using "host passthrough"
+   (via the command-line ``-cpu host``).
+
+3. Now the KVM module can be loaded in the L1 (guest hypervisor)::
+
+    $ modprobe kvm
+
+
+Live migration with nested KVM
+------------------------------
+
+Migrating an L1 guest, with a  *live* nested guest in it, to another
+bare metal host, works as of Linux kernel 5.3 and QEMU 4.2.0 for
+Intel x86 systems, and even on older versions for s390x.
+
+On AMD systems, once an L1 guest has started an L2 guest, the L1 guest
+should no longer be migrated or saved (refer to QEMU documentation on
+"savevm"/"loadvm") until the L2 guest shuts down.  Attempting to migrate
+or save-and-load an L1 guest while an L2 guest is running will result in
+undefined behavior.  You might see a ``kernel BUG!`` entry in ``dmesg``, a
+kernel 'oops', or an outright kernel panic.  Such a migrated or loaded L1
+guest can no longer be considered stable or secure, and must be restarted.
+Migrating an L1 guest merely configured to support nesting, while not
+actually running L2 guests, is expected to function normally even on AMD
+systems but may fail once guests are started.
+
+Migrating an L2 guest is always expected to succeed, so all the following
+scenarios should work even on AMD systems:
+
+- Migrating a nested guest (L2) to another L1 guest on the *same* bare
+  metal host.
+
+- Migrating a nested guest (L2) to another L1 guest on a *different*
+  bare metal host.
+
+- Migrating a nested guest (L2) to a bare metal host.
+
+Reporting bugs from nested setups
+-----------------------------------
+
+Debugging "nested" problems can involve sifting through log files across
+L0, L1 and L2; this can result in tedious back-n-forth between the bug
+reporter and the bug fixer.
+
+- Mention that you are in a "nested" setup.  If you are running any kind
+  of "nesting" at all, say so.  Unfortunately, this needs to be called
+  out because when reporting bugs, people tend to forget to even
+  *mention* that they're using nested virtualization.
+
+- Ensure you are actually running KVM on KVM.  Sometimes people do not
+  have KVM enabled for their guest hypervisor (L1), which results in
+  them running with pure emulation or what QEMU calls it as "TCG", but
+  they think they're running nested KVM.  Thus confusing "nested Virt"
+  (which could also mean, QEMU on KVM) with "nested KVM" (KVM on KVM).
+
+Information to collect (generic)
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+The following is not an exhaustive list, but a very good starting point:
+
+  - Kernel, libvirt, and QEMU version from L0
+
+  - Kernel, libvirt and QEMU version from L1
+
+  - QEMU command-line of L1 -- when using libvirt, you'll find it here:
+    ``/var/log/libvirt/qemu/instance.log``
+
+  - QEMU command-line of L2 -- as above, when using libvirt, get the
+    complete libvirt-generated QEMU command-line
+
+  - ``cat /sys/cpuinfo`` from L0
+
+  - ``cat /sys/cpuinfo`` from L1
+
+  - ``lscpu`` from L0
+
+  - ``lscpu`` from L1
+
+  - Full ``dmesg`` output from L0
+
+  - Full ``dmesg`` output from L1
+
+x86-specific info to collect
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Both the below commands, ``x86info`` and ``dmidecode``, should be
+available on most Linux distributions with the same name:
+
+  - Output of: ``x86info -a`` from L0
+
+  - Output of: ``x86info -a`` from L1
+
+  - Output of: ``dmidecode`` from L0
+
+  - Output of: ``dmidecode`` from L1
+
+s390x-specific info to collect
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Along with the earlier mentioned generic details, the below is
+also recommended:
+
+  - ``/proc/sysinfo`` from L1; this will also include the info from L0